2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid-like effects of five novel carboxamide synthetic cannabinoids

Abstract: A new generation of novel cannabinoid compounds have been developed as marijuana substitutes to avoid drug control laws and cannabinoid blood tests. 5F-MDMB-PINACA (also known as 5F-ADB, 5F-ADB-PINACA), MDMB-CHIMICA, MDMB-FUBINACA, ADB-FUBINACA, and AMB-FUBINACA (also known as FUB-AMB, MMB-FUBINACA) were tested for in vivo cannabinoid-like effects to assess their abuse liability. Locomotor activity in mice was tested to screen for locomotor depressant effects and to identify behaviorally-active dose ranges and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, AMB‐FUBINACA is not only more potent, it also generates a stronger response at CB1 than the reference compound JWH‐018 at high concentrations. Although it is difficult to compare EC 50 values from different assays (due to different experimental setups), our low nanomolar values are in line with those found in other reports investigating the in vitro and in vivo activity of AMB‐FUBINACA . More particularly, Banister et al and Gamage et al estimated the EC 50 and the E max values for AMB‐FUBINACA via the FLIPR ® assay and via the [ 35 S]GTP binding assay and via the inhibition of forskolin‐stimulated cAMP production, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore, AMB‐FUBINACA is not only more potent, it also generates a stronger response at CB1 than the reference compound JWH‐018 at high concentrations. Although it is difficult to compare EC 50 values from different assays (due to different experimental setups), our low nanomolar values are in line with those found in other reports investigating the in vitro and in vivo activity of AMB‐FUBINACA . More particularly, Banister et al and Gamage et al estimated the EC 50 and the E max values for AMB‐FUBINACA via the FLIPR ® assay and via the [ 35 S]GTP binding assay and via the inhibition of forskolin‐stimulated cAMP production, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Acute intoxication by JWH-018, also led participants to score higher on drug compulsivity and drug liking. Compulsive craving is a typical feature of drug dependence (Heishman et al 2001); hence, these effects demonstrate the abuse liability of JWH-018, similar to that shown previously for SCs in rodents (Gatch and Forster 2019;Zanda and Fattore 2018;Fantegrossi et al 2014). From natural cannabis, it is known that it can cause psychotomimetic symptoms in healthy volunteers and induce psychosis in vulnerable people (Johns 2001;Henquet et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Adverse effects may be cardiovascular (e.g., sympathomimetic effects such as tachycardia, palpitations, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmias), neurological (e.g., seizures, tremors, stroke, fear, aggressive behavior, changing moods, and confusion [ 9 ]), gastrointestinal (e.g., nausea and vomiting), psychological (e.g., agitation, confusion, drowsiness, lethargy, hallucination, irritability, and paranoia), pulmonary (e.g., respiratory depression), metabolic, or muscular [ 10 , 11 ]. However, unlike cannabis, SCs have significant potential to cause severe and life-threatening toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%