2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid receptor agonists from Conus venoms alleviate pain-related behavior in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger volume of cyclotides, approximately eight times that of endogenous 2-AG and other cannabinoids, may account for the moderate affinity and potency of vodo-C1 at CB 2 R. The bulkier size might impede deep penetration of the receptor binding-core ( 18 ) (∼415–447 ų), ideally suited for binding of small molecule cannabinoid ligands ( 41 ). Peptide ligands of cannabinoid receptors like vodo-C1, including the recently discovered venom peptides that target CB 1 R ( 59 ) may preferably interact with the extracellular regions of the binding pocket. While molecular details of peptide-ligand interaction with the CB 2 R remain speculative, the identification of vodo-C1 as a plant-derived peptide CB 2 R agonist expands the list known phytocannabinoids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger volume of cyclotides, approximately eight times that of endogenous 2-AG and other cannabinoids, may account for the moderate affinity and potency of vodo-C1 at CB 2 R. The bulkier size might impede deep penetration of the receptor binding-core ( 18 ) (∼415–447 ų), ideally suited for binding of small molecule cannabinoid ligands ( 41 ). Peptide ligands of cannabinoid receptors like vodo-C1, including the recently discovered venom peptides that target CB 1 R ( 59 ) may preferably interact with the extracellular regions of the binding pocket. While molecular details of peptide-ligand interaction with the CB 2 R remain speculative, the identification of vodo-C1 as a plant-derived peptide CB 2 R agonist expands the list known phytocannabinoids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interphase during the formalin test is characterized by the absence of algogenic compounds, and the mechanism underlying this phenomenon remains unclear (27). In the formalin test, the response behavior of lifting, flinching, and licking the injected paw is recorded and quantified (28,29). Prior studies have shown that an injection of formaldehyde solution in the hind paw, ranging from 19-616 mM, elicits an immediate first phase response characterized by pain-related licking behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultures were rinsed with Hyclone phosphate buffered solution (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and washed with Hyclone PBS. Fixed cells were immunostained overnight with Alexa 594 conjugated anti-hemagglutinin 1:500 (2μL/mL, Invitrogen, ThermoFisher, USA) to visualize the CB1 receptor [54,56,57]. Excess antibody was removed and cells were washed with PBS and counter-stained with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to reveal the nuclei.…”
Section: Cb1 Redistribution Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%