2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoids reward sensitivity in a neurodevelopmental animal model of schizophrenia: A brain stimulation reward study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large body of literature has consistently linked cannabis use to the exacerbation of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. So far, very few studies have investigated whether THC exacerbates schizophrenia-like symptoms in adult animals [59][60][61][62][63][64]. Our study shows that THC can produce a broad range of deficits in healthy animals that resembled those observed in animal models of schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large body of literature has consistently linked cannabis use to the exacerbation of positive symptoms of schizophrenia. So far, very few studies have investigated whether THC exacerbates schizophrenia-like symptoms in adult animals [59][60][61][62][63][64]. Our study shows that THC can produce a broad range of deficits in healthy animals that resembled those observed in animal models of schizophrenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…After excluding confounding effects on motor activity (see Material and Method), we found that THC administration at the lowest (0.1 mg/kg), but not the highest (1 mg/kg; a dose that did not produce place preference in Braida's study [58]), dose had beneficial effects on various correlates of schizophrenia (see above). While there is a large literature on THC exposure in adolescent rodents, few studies [59][60][61][62][63][64] have assessed THC effects on schizophrenia-related behavioral deficits in adult rodents. For instance, Malone et al, [62] reported that the prepulse inhibition deficit (an operational measure of sensorimotor gating) observed in adult rats reared in isolation was worsened by THC (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.v.).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a brain stimulation paradigm in young adult rats, reward thresholds following acute amphetamine are similarly elevated in NVHL and sham controls, yet this elevation drops off more rapidly in NVHL rats, indicating increased tolerance for amphetamine [69]. In a drug self-administration paradigm, NVHL rats show higher motivation for methamphetamine selfadministration under a progressive ratio schedule, but no differences in responding under a fixed ratio schedule of reinforcement [70].…”
Section: Psychostimulants: Amphetamine and Methamphetaminementioning
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, young adult but not adolescent NVHL rats exhibit a greater aversion to WIN in a conditioned place preference paradigm compared to controls, yet the opposite effect occurs for CB 1 receptor agonist ∆ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinnol (THC), where sham controls demonstrate an aversion for THC, which is not present in NVHL rats [85]. These findings are mirrored in a brain stimulation reward paradigm, where THC produces a weak attenuation of reward in sham controls, but not NVHL rats, and WIN has the opposite effect, attenuating reward in NVHL rats but enhancing it in controls [69]. The different effects of THC and WIN may be due to different pharmacokinetics between the two drugs (e.g.…”
Section: Ethanolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, contrasting results have often been reported, even from the same authors. For example, a lack of effect of THC and other cannabinoid agonists has been reported (Arnold et al 2001a; Gallo et al 2014; Vlachou et al 2003), as well as decreases in the effectiveness of brain stimulation (Fokos and Panagis 2010; Katsidoni et al 2013; Mavrikaki et al 2010; Vlachou et al 2005; 2006; Vlachou et al 2007; Wiebelhaus et al 2015), an effect that was shown to be reversed by administration of very low doses, in the µg/kg range, of CB1 receptor antagonists (Vlachou et al 2003; 2005; Vlachou et al 2007). …”
Section: Intra-cranial Self-stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%