2023
DOI: 10.1111/add.16337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabis use disorder and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: A population‐based retrospective cohort analysis of adults from Alberta, Canada

Anees Bahji,
Josh Hathaway,
Denise Adams
et al.

Abstract: AimTo measure the association between cannabis use disorder (CUD) and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes.Design and SettingWe conducted a matched, population‐based retrospective cohort study involving five linked administrative health databases from Alberta, Canada.ParticipantsWe identified participants with CUD diagnosis codes and matched them to participants without CUD codes by gender, year of birth and time of presentation to the health system. We included 29 764 pairs (n = 59 528 individuals in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Administrative diagnostic codes for illicit substance use disorders, including cannabis, have very high specificity (greater than 95%). [29][30][31][32][33] Other variables were included a priori based on prior work and clinical plausibility. These included factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity (i.e., Black, Hispanic, White, and other [including Native Americans, Asians, and Pacific Islander due to sample size constraints]), primary payer, type of admission (i.e., elective and nonelective), and median household income based on zip code.…”
Section: Primary Exposures and Outcome Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Administrative diagnostic codes for illicit substance use disorders, including cannabis, have very high specificity (greater than 95%). [29][30][31][32][33] Other variables were included a priori based on prior work and clinical plausibility. These included factors such as age, sex, race/ethnicity (i.e., Black, Hispanic, White, and other [including Native Americans, Asians, and Pacific Islander due to sample size constraints]), primary payer, type of admission (i.e., elective and nonelective), and median household income based on zip code.…”
Section: Primary Exposures and Outcome Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%