2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2010
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2010.5490400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical correlation analysis applied to functional connectivity in MEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The columns of Following computation of β , it is possible to apply previously established CCA methods (Soto et al, 2009, Soto et al, 2010, Barnes et al, 2011, Brookes et al, 2012b. We first compute the covariance explained by the estimate β W Xo as:…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The columns of Following computation of β , it is possible to apply previously established CCA methods (Soto et al, 2009, Soto et al, 2010, Barnes et al, 2011, Brookes et al, 2012b. We first compute the covariance explained by the estimate β W Xo as:…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this in mind, it is noteworthy that electrophysiological metrics such as MEG have significant advantages over fMRI: increased time resolution offers advantages in characterising temporal non-stationarity whilst the direct nature of MEG allows a non-invasive window on neural oscillations, and therefore spectral structure. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique to characterise functional connectivity, based upon beamforming (Van Veen et al, 1997, Robinson and Vrba, 1998, Gross et al, 2001, Sekihara et al, 2006, Brookes et al, 2008 and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) (Soto et al, 2010, Barnes et al, 2011, Brookes et al, 2012b. We extend work presented in our previous papers (Brookes et al, 2011a, Brookes et al, 2012b, Hall et al, 2013 by developing a method capable of measuring the temporal, spectral and spatial variation in functional connectivity, assessed by band limited envelope correlation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Canonical correlation [2] is one way to determine relationships between sets of channels. Canonical correlation finds the most related components of y1 and y2 by maximizing a correlation measure between projections of each vector:…”
Section: Canonical Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When M1 = M2 = 1, optimization reduces to bivariate Granger causality. Since the calculation of variances is a bivariate model independent of M1 and M2, the number of parameters is O(M1 + M2), an order lower than multivariate causality (2). In comparison to very recent independent work on regional causality [4] we maximize causality rather than residual correlation.…”
Section: Proposed: Canonical Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation