2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2016
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2016.7869553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical correlations for target detection in a passive radar network

Abstract: In this work, we consider a two-channel multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) passive detection problem, in which there is a surveillance array and a reference array. The reference array is known to carry a linear combination of broadband noise and a subspace signal of known dimension but unknown basis. The question is whether the surveillance channel carries a linear combination of broadband noise and a subspace signal of unknown basis, which is correlated with the subspace signal in the reference channel. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 shows the results obtained for different SNR values. Not surprisingly, the GLRT in [19] provides the best results for both noise models (it is matched to Model 4). In general, the GLRT with assumed unknown noise variance is more robust against mismatched noise models than is the GLRT with assumed known noise variance.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3 shows the results obtained for different SNR values. Not surprisingly, the GLRT in [19] provides the best results for both noise models (it is matched to Model 4). In general, the GLRT with assumed unknown noise variance is more robust against mismatched noise models than is the GLRT with assumed known noise variance.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…) to a threshold, where the k i 's are squared canonical coordinates of the two channel sample covariance matrix [19], [20]. For the GLRT with known noise variance we use…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…with C = Σ −1 1 Σ 1,2 Σ −1 2 Σ 2,1 being the squared coherence matrix ( [13], [4]). If we denote λ i as the eigenvalues of C, which correspond to the canonical variables of the CCA, we can express the GC as follows:…”
Section: Generalized Coherencementioning
confidence: 99%