2013
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139208666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical Ramsey Theory on Polish Spaces

Abstract: This book lays the foundations for an exciting new area of research in descriptive set theory. It develops a robust connection between two active topics: forcing and analytic equivalence relations. This in turn allows the authors to develop a generalization of classical Ramsey theory. Given an analytic equivalence relation on a Polish space, can one find a large subset of the space on which it has a simple form? The book provides many positive and negative general answers to this question. The proofs feature p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The compactum M Ď f pUq is disjoint from D, hence boundary in f pUq, and we have, cf. (6) in Section 2, L Ď q f U rMs, which completes the proof of the claim.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 (I)supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compactum M Ď f pUq is disjoint from D, hence boundary in f pUq, and we have, cf. (6) in Section 2, L Ď q f U rMs, which completes the proof of the claim.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11 (I)supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Then, conditions (2), (3), (4) are met. Now, (4) guarantees that (5) the sequence ph n q uniformly converges to a continuous function g : XÑ H, (6) g|C n " h n |C n for n P N. From (2), (6) and the fact that the Cantor sets gpC n q are pairwise disjoint, cf. (3), we infer that for any Borel set A Ď X, ν´A X ď n C n¯" ÿ n νpA X C n q " ÿ n µpgpA X C n qq " µ´gpA X ď n C n q¯.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let f be Δ 1 1 ( p) in L; p ∈ L ∩ ω ω . By Shoenfield, it is true in L[x] that f : 2 ω → ω ω is still a Δ 1 1 ( p) reduction of E 0 to E. 9 Let y = f (x). Then the E-class…”
Section: Lemma 82mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And a quick look at the Zentralblatt's list of authors who have published papers classified as Other combinatorial number theory, code 11B75, provides a Who's Who of Ramsey theory, including Paul Erd} os, Ron Graham, and Endre Szemerédi, which illustrates the close connection between Ramsey theory and Combinatorial Number theory. Monograph titles on Ramsey theory range from Ramsey Theory on Integers [12] and Elemental Methods in Ergodic Ramsey Theory [15] to Canonical Ramsey Theory on Polish Spaces [14]. A survey article [22] on applications of Ramsey theory includes a bibliography of 269 items.…”
Section: R Rmentioning
confidence: 99%