2002
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.65.033609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical statistics of trapped ideal and interacting Bose gases

Abstract: The mean ground state occupation number and condensate fluctuations of interacting and non-interacting Bose gases confined in a harmonic trap are considered by using a canonical ensemble approach. To obtain the mean ground state occupation number and the condensate fluctuations, an analytical description for the probability distribution function of the condensate is provided directly starting from the analysis of the partition function of the system. For the ideal Bose gas, the probability distribution functio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
47
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(116 reference statements)
2
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But the contradictory results in Refs. [3,7,8,11] with that in Refs. [9,12] within the same Bogoliubov approximation deserve further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But the contradictory results in Refs. [3,7,8,11] with that in Refs. [9,12] within the same Bogoliubov approximation deserve further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Particularly, even for the Bogoliubov approximation, both γ = 4/3 [3,5,7,8,11] and γ = 1 [9,12] scaling laws have been obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical properties [5][6][7][8][9][10] and, in particular, condensate fluctuations have been investigated for ideal and weakly interacting Bose gases (WIBGs), both within the canonical [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and microcanonical [11,18,19,[21][22][23][24] ensembles, where the differences between ideal…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%