2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical systems with discrete spectrum

Abstract: We study spectral properties of two-dimensional canonical systems y ′ (t) = zJH(t)y(t), t ∈ [a, b), where the Hamiltonian H is locally integrable on [a, b), positive semidefinite, and Weyl's limit point case takes place at b. We answer the following questions explicitly in terms of H:Is the spectrum of the associated selfadjoint operator discrete ?If it is discrete, what is its asymptotic distribution ?Here asymptotic distribution means summability and limit superior conditions relative to comparison functions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This connection will play a crucial role in our approach to obtain discreteness criteria for generalized indefinite strings. However, let us mention that the discreteness criteria as well as the criteria when the spectrum σ of a generalized indefinite string satisfies (1.2) can also be obtained by using the recent results of [30], as there is a bijective correspondence between generalized indefinite strings and 2 × 2 canonical systems; see [12,Section 6]. On the other hand, one may look at our results as an alternative way to obtain discreteness criteria for 2 × 2 canonical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This connection will play a crucial role in our approach to obtain discreteness criteria for generalized indefinite strings. However, let us mention that the discreteness criteria as well as the criteria when the spectrum σ of a generalized indefinite string satisfies (1.2) can also be obtained by using the recent results of [30], as there is a bijective correspondence between generalized indefinite strings and 2 × 2 canonical systems; see [12,Section 6]. On the other hand, one may look at our results as an alternative way to obtain discreteness criteria for 2 × 2 canonical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Removing the positivity assumption makes the corresponding considerations much more complicated. For instance, despite its fundamental importance, a discreteness criterion for 2 × 2 canonical systems was found only recently by R. Romanov and H. Woracek [30] (see also [29]). Surprisingly enough (at least to the authors), a discreteness criterion for indefinite strings (the case when the measure υ vanishes identically and ω is a real-valued Borel measure on [0, L)) has essentially been available since the 1970s, when C. A. Stuart [33] established a compactness criterion for integral operators in the Hilbert space L 2 [0, ∞) of the form J : f → ∞ 0 q(max( • , t))f (t)dt, (1.3) for a function q in L 2 loc [0, ∞).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For illustration, let us mention two examples of such theorems. It is possible to explicitly characterise those Hamiltonians H for which q H has an analytic continuation to C \ [0, ∞), see [17], or those Hamiltonians for which q H has a meromorphic continuation to all of C, see [15]. The first result characterises that the differential operator associated with (1.1) is non-negative, the second one that it has discrete spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canonical systems are important objects of analysis, being perhaps the most important class of the one-dimensional Hamiltonian systems and including (as subclasses) several classical equations. They have been actively studied in many already classical as well as in various recent works (see, e.g., [1,5,7,12,13,18,20,[22][23][24][25][30][31][32][36][37][38]41,42] and numerous references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%