2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy enhanced chloride deposition in coastal South Australia and its application for the chloride mass balance method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Deng et al (2013), we define the enhancement due to vegetation E (%) as the relative increase in chloride deposition induced by the canopy:…”
Section: Rainfall/throughfall Collection and Chloride Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Following Deng et al (2013), we define the enhancement due to vegetation E (%) as the relative increase in chloride deposition induced by the canopy:…”
Section: Rainfall/throughfall Collection and Chloride Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the downwind reduction equals the canopy-induced enhancement, vegetation might not change the total chloride deposition at basin scale. Nevertheless, Deng et al (2013) have shown evidence to support vegetation enhanced chloride deposition over a catchment. Moreover, even if the effect of vegetation only results in the redistribution of the chloride deposition, measurements in the open field (downwind of vegetation stands) would underestimate the total chloride deposition.…”
Section: Chloride Deposition Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Net rainfall reaches the forest floor through the tree canopy by throughfall and stem flow (Aikawa et al, 2006;Deng et al, 2013;Hinko-Najera et al, 2015;Rahmani et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2009). Throughfall is the part of rainfall that reaches forest floor either through dripping from the tree canopies and after fulfilling initial interception storage or direct passing the canopy gaps (Chappell and Bidin, 2001;David et al, 2011;Díaz et al, 2007;Guswa and Spence, 2012;Huber and Iroumé, 2001;Rahmani et al, 2011;Roberts and Rosier, 2005;Wuyts et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2006;Zimmermann and Zimmermann, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%