Canted antiferromagnetism and magnetoelastic coupling in metallic

Hagdorn, K.; Hohlwein, D.; Ihringer, J.; Knorr, K.; Prandl, W.; Ritter, H.; Schmid, H.; Zeiske, Th.

doi:10.1007/s100510050935

Cited by 34 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3,4,5,6,7 The application of simple DE across the whole of the phase diagram, however, contradicts experimental evidence by predicting either homogenous canting or the pure FM state at all points, in contrast with the rich phase diagram experimentally observed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Inhomogeneous magnetism in La-dopedCaMnO3.I. Mesoscopic phase separation due to lattice-coupled ferromagnetic interactions

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A detailed investigation of mesoscopic magnetic and crystallographic phase separation in Ca1−xLaxMnO3, 0.00 ≤ x ≤ 0.20, is reported. Neutron powder diffraction and DC-magnetization techniques have been used to isolate the different roles played by electrons doped into the eg level as a function of their concentration x. The presence of multiple low-temperature magnetic and crystallographic phases within individual polycrystalline samples is argued to be an intrinsic feature of the system that follows from the shifting balance between competing FM and AFM interactions as a function of temperature. FM double-exchange interactions associated with doped eg electrons are favored over competing AFM interactions at higher temperatures, and couple more strongly with the lattice via orbital polarization. These FM interactions thereby play a privileged role, even at low eg electron concentrations, by virtue of structural modifications induced above the AFM transition temperatures.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Inhomogeneous magnetism in La-dopedCaMnO3.I. Mesoscopic phase separation due to lattice-coupled ferromagnetic interactions

et al. 2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(i) Ling et al [7,8] proposed that inhomogeneities at low temperature (which exist also in Sm 0 [10]). These characterizations, summarized in Fig.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Particular attention was paid to the unexpected behaviour observed for the low electron-doped regime, where a ferromagnetic (FM) component develops together with G-type antiferromagnetism (AFM), for which each Mn is AFM coupled with the six Mn nearestneighbours. This ability of G-type AFM to allow a FM component is discussed in terms of canting or phase separation [5], the latter being more often admitted [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This particular state, resulting from competing interactions, leads to unusual signatures in the magnetic characterizations [14] that are also observed in manganites with similar Mn valence, but which are obtained by substitution on the Mn site instead of the Ln one.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Magnetic study of CaMn0.96Mo0.04O3, canting vs. phase separation

Martin

Miclău

Hébert

et al. 2009

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Refs. [3][4][5][6][7]). At the holedoped end of the phase diagram (xB1), however, an analogous FM component has recently been shown to be locally inhomogeneous, consisting of a liquid distribution of strongly canted B10 ( A clusters embedded in a lightly canted matrix [8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%