2013
DOI: 10.1057/cep.2013.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cantonal variations of integration policy and their impact on immigrant educational inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same challenges apply to the recombined MIPEX scores here. For the MIPEX data, the involved experts try to choose the “typical” position, such as where cantonal differences exist in Switzerland (for an overview, see Manatschal, ; Manatschal and Stadelmann‐Steffen, ). A different solution is to focus on the subnational level where this makes sense.…”
Section: Citizenship Models: a Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same challenges apply to the recombined MIPEX scores here. For the MIPEX data, the involved experts try to choose the “typical” position, such as where cantonal differences exist in Switzerland (for an overview, see Manatschal, ; Manatschal and Stadelmann‐Steffen, ). A different solution is to focus on the subnational level where this makes sense.…”
Section: Citizenship Models: a Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adapted to the Swiss context, the index by Manatschal (2011) measures civic-political, socio-structural, and cultural/religious rights of immigrants as well as requirements for family reunification and anti-discrimination regulations. 4 As Manatschal and Stadelmann-Steffen (2013) showed, the policy variation at the cantonal level is substantial and comparable with the variation across Western European countries. 5 On the individual level, we include socio-demographics such as gender, age, and education along with measures of left-right ideology, closeness to the conservative/right wing Swiss People's Party (SVP), urban versus rural living area, as well as church attendance and religious denomination (none, Protestant, Catholic, Other).…”
Section: Controlsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Researchers can obtain fine‐grained, comparative data on national immigrant policies—from number of hours of a language class to the cost of tests—over a small (Hernes, ) or medium‐sized sample (Goodman, ). Policies can also be collected at the subnational level (Kraal & Vertovec, ), including across cantons (Manatschal & Stadelmann‐Steffen, , ), regions (Strazzari, ), and cities (Caponio, ). Further still, applicable rules exist in different policy domains, including establishing legal status (Borevi, Jensen, & Mouritsen, ; Goodman, ), family reunification (Bech, Borevi, & Mouritsen, ; Bonjour, ) but also welfare (Boucher, ), and other social policies (Baldi & Goodman, ).…”
Section: Definition and Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%