2014
DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.62-c1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capabilities, limitations, and misconceptions of using OCT to assess vulnerable plaques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the authors also stated axial core lengths were statistically longer in the highest-risk groups (rACS and sAMI) compared with ls-SAP, although the relevance of this was not addressed. Acknowledging the limitations of using registry data and current OCT characterization criteria, the data provide a compelling argument that a failed plaque-healing response may be a crucial factor in plaque-rupture progression to ACS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Second, the authors also stated axial core lengths were statistically longer in the highest-risk groups (rACS and sAMI) compared with ls-SAP, although the relevance of this was not addressed. Acknowledging the limitations of using registry data and current OCT characterization criteria, the data provide a compelling argument that a failed plaque-healing response may be a crucial factor in plaque-rupture progression to ACS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ultrasound cannot identify if a tumor is cancerous or not, as sound waves are highly attenuated by multiple layers of the human body. Te OCT employs light waves rather than sound waves like ultrasound; however, their medium opacity can limit optimal imaging and depth limitation of 1-4 mm [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%