2016
DOI: 10.1089/space.2016.0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capability and Cost-Effectiveness of Launch Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it is assumed that the mission takes place in a mid-to far-term time frame, suggesting that intermediate missions have matured relevant technologies. The BFR has been chosen for these missions since it is assumed that the (promised) specific launch cost [$/kg] of the BFR ($96) is more likely to be the norm in a mid-to far-term timeframe, compared to the much higher specific cost for currently-available vehicles (∼$6-10k (Boone and Miller, 2016)).…”
Section: Mission Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is assumed that the mission takes place in a mid-to far-term time frame, suggesting that intermediate missions have matured relevant technologies. The BFR has been chosen for these missions since it is assumed that the (promised) specific launch cost [$/kg] of the BFR ($96) is more likely to be the norm in a mid-to far-term timeframe, compared to the much higher specific cost for currently-available vehicles (∼$6-10k (Boone and Miller, 2016)).…”
Section: Mission Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that the cost per kg actually used may be different from what is reported due to the amount of wasted payload capacity every launch. 14) Before the re-classification, launch systems are presented following the three classical classifications defined in The New SMAD according to their payload capability to LEO; namely, small launch systems (<5,000 lb), medium ([5,000 lb, 12,000 lb)), intermediate launch systems ([12,000 lb, 25,000 lb)) and heavy launch systems (!25,000 lb). As of 16th March 2019, the different concerned properties of selected launch systems are exhibited in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, to cover the most significant performance indexes.…”
Section: Launch Vehicle Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The launch vehicle database established in our previous research is updated with the launch data from the International Reference Guide to Space Launch Systems, 8) Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD, 9) and online space launch system data. [10][11][12] Note that although the cost per kilogram actually delivered to orbit may be different from that advertised due to the amount of wasted payload capacity every launch, 13) we still use the total cost divided by the maximum payload as the metric for unit cost. Based on the previous version, 14) one new attribute, namely average launch cycle, is added to the database to reveal the general frequency of the launch activities.…”
Section: Updated Launch Vehicle Databasementioning
confidence: 99%