2009
DOI: 10.1109/tia.2009.2018903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capability Evaluation and Statistical Control of Electrostatic Separation Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimators of mean and variance-covariance calculated by (13) and (14) are replaced in (5). Hotelling's T² control chart plots the following quantity:…”
Section: Estimate µ and σmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimators of mean and variance-covariance calculated by (13) and (14) are replaced in (5). Hotelling's T² control chart plots the following quantity:…”
Section: Estimate µ and σmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When two or several characteristics of a product (output variables of a process) are correlated, mutivariate control charts can be exploited. This is the case with the electrostatic separation processes [12]- [14], for which three output variables have to be under control, namely the masses conductor, non-conductor and middling products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reduce the variability, so that to constantly respect the quality requirements. In a series of previous articles (Medles et al, 2009; Senouci et al, 2009, 2010) we have pointed out how capability and control chart concepts could be applied to electrostatic separation employed in the recycling industry. Defined as the selective sorting of charged or polarized bodies under the action of electric field forces (Ralston, 1961), the electrostatic separation is a continuous process–the outcome of which is a function of numerous factors, including flow-rate, granule size, electrode system configuration, high-voltage level, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the separation of copper from electric cable wastes is satisfactory when the mass of middling is small, and the grade of both metal and insulating products is high (Senouci et al, 2010). Monitoring of each criterion independently by distinct control charts has the advantage of simplicity, but it is not the most effective (Medles et al, 2009; Senouci et al, 2010). Superimposing univariate charts is not an appropriate solution when the variables are correlated, as is the case with the electrostatic separation processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%