1993
DOI: 10.1109/52.219617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capability maturity model, version 1.1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
512
0
33

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 899 publications
(546 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
512
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Paulk (1993), maturity means the state or condition of full development, state or quality of mature. When the CMM model was proposed, it was structured and developed in a way that could be represented in different levels of maturity.…”
Section: Lesson 8: Distributed Software Development Is a Maturity Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Paulk (1993), maturity means the state or condition of full development, state or quality of mature. When the CMM model was proposed, it was structured and developed in a way that could be represented in different levels of maturity.…”
Section: Lesson 8: Distributed Software Development Is a Maturity Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its framework proposes five levels of process maturity: initial, repeatable, defined, managed, and optimizing [Paulk, 1993]. This same framework can be applied to process management.…”
Section: Sei Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the past ten years have witnessed explosive growth in work on the evaluation of software processes. Most of this work has grown out of the proposal of Humphrey and his colleagues at the Software Engineering Institute, of the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) [7] [16]. The aim of the CMM is to provide an evaluation vehicle for determining the quality of an organization's software development processes.…”
Section: Process Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%