Capability of 3D Printing Technology in Producing Molar Teeth Prototype

Ahmad, Mohd Nazri; Tarmeze, Ahmad Afiq; Rasib, Amir Hamzah Abdul

doi:10.15866/irea.v8i2.17949

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Publications according to the subcategories for the detailed analysis of applied methods as introduced in chapter 2.2.10. and visualized in Fig. 5 Basic Approach Tools for Linear Measurements Publications lin DICOM [ 80 , 81 ] cal [ 21 , 69 , 71 , 82 – 101 ] 3Dcal [ 17 , 31 , 102 – 110 ] surf [ 17 – 19 , 31 , 85 , 103 , 105 – 128 ] other [ 129 – 141 ] basic approach: linear (lin) or surface (surf) deviation based analysis; tools for linear measurements: DICOM: CT-Scan of 3D-printed model and linear measurements on resulting DICOM data, cal: caliper, 3Dcal: 3D-scan and virtual linear measurements; could not be assigned to any of the introduced categories (other) …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review

Schulze,

Juergensen,

Rischen

et al. 2024

3D Print Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The responsible use of 3D-printing in medicine includes a context-based quality assurance. Considerable literature has been published in this field, yet the quality of assessment varies widely. The limited discriminatory power of some assessment methods challenges the comparison of results. The total error for patient specific anatomical models comprises relevant partial errors of the production process: segmentation error (SegE), digital editing error (DEE), printing error (PrE). The present review provides an overview to improve the general understanding of the process specific errors, quantitative analysis, and standardized terminology. Methods This review focuses on literature on quality assurance of patient-specific anatomical models in terms of geometric accuracy published before December 4th, 2022 (n = 139). In an attempt to organize the literature, the publications are assigned to comparable categories and the absolute values of the maximum mean deviation (AMMD) per publication are determined therein. Results The three major examined types of original structures are teeth or jaw (n = 52), skull bones without jaw (n = 17) and heart with coronary arteries (n = 16). VPP (vat photopolymerization) is the most frequently employed basic 3D-printing technology (n = 112 experiments). The median values of AMMD (AMMD: The metric AMMD is defined as the largest linear deviation, based on an average value from at least two individual measurements.) are 0.8 mm for the SegE, 0.26 mm for the PrE and 0.825 mm for the total error. No average values are found for the DEE. Conclusion The total error is not significantly higher than the partial errors which may compensate each other. Consequently SegE, DEE and PrE should be analyzed individually to describe the result quality as their sum according to rules of error propagation. Current methods for quality assurance of the segmentation are often either realistic and accurate or resource efficient. Future research should focus on implementing models for cost effective evaluations with high accuracy and realism. Our system of categorization may be enhancing the understanding of the overall process and a valuable contribution to the structural design and reporting of future experiments. It can be used to educate specialists for risk assessment and process validation within the additive manufacturing industry. Graphical Abstract Context of the figures in this review. Center: Fig. 5+ 7; top (blue): Fig. 8; right (green): Fig. 9; bottom (yellow): Fig. 10; left (red): Fig. 11. A version in high resolution can be found online in the supplementary material.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review

Schulze,

Juergensen,

Rischen

et al. 2024

3D Print Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They employ FDM because it enhances the development of their products, the prototype process, and the manufacturing process. The potential of 3D printers to produce prosthetic human teeth was demonstrated by Ahmad et al [18] in their study. Figure 1 shows a draw gear, a print head, a nozzle, a printing bed, and a spool of filament as an illustration of the basic FDM parts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

A Review of Natural Fiber-Based Filaments for 3D Printing: Filament Fabrication and Characterization

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today, additive manufacturing (AM) is the most recent technology used to produce detailed and complexly built parts for a variety of applications. The most emphasis has been given to fused deposition modeling (FDM) in the development and manufacturing fields. Natural fibers have received attention in the area of 3D printing to be employed as bio-filters with thermoplastics, which have prompted an effort for more ecologically acceptable methods of manufacturing. The development of natural fiber composite filaments for FDM requires meticulous methods and in-depth knowledge of the properties of natural fibers and their matrices. Thus, this paper reviews natural fiber-based 3D printing filaments. It covers the fabrication method and characterization of thermoplastic materials blended with natural fiber-produced wire filament. The characterization of wire filament includes the mechanical properties, dimension stability, morphological study, and surface quality. There is also a discussion of the difficulties in developing a natural fiber composite filament. Last but not least, the prospects of natural fiber-based filaments for FDM 3D printing are also discussed. It is hoped that, after reading this article, readers will have enough knowledge regarding how natural fiber composite filament for FDM is created.

show abstract

“…According to Kumbhar et al, [10], post-processing procedures are typically utilized to increase surface smoothness. Ahmad et al, [11][12] has discovered the optimum parameters of FDM using ABS material and used PolyJet 3D printer to print 30 samples of molar teeth. The primary advantages of this FDM method are ease of access, lower equipment costs, and multicolored product printing; when compared to other RP processes, this approach is less expensive and more cost-effective.…”

Section: Fdm Technologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rheological Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composite for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): A Short Review

Ahmad

Ishak

Taha

et al. 2022

ARFMTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the development and manufacturing industries, fused deposition modeling (FDM) receives the greatest attention. It is the most important additive manufacturing (AM) technique, which refers to the process of depositing multiple layers of material in a computer-controlled environment to form a three-dimensional product. Research is presently focusing on the development of 3D printed bio-composite polymers with improved performance. Many studies on the development of new composite materials using natural fiber as a feedstock filament for FDM have recently been published. As a result, conducting a rheology characteristics analysis of new composite materials made from natural resources is required. Its major purpose is to describe the flow behavior of the fiber composite material and determine the optimal melting temperature for the extrusion process of producing wire filament. Thus, this paper focuses on rheological properties of fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite for FDM.

show abstract

Capability of 3D Printing Technology in Producing Molar Teeth Prototype

Cited by 9 publications

References 12 publications

Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review

Quality assurance of 3D-printed patient specific anatomical models: a systematic review

A Review of Natural Fiber-Based Filaments for 3D Printing: Filament Fabrication and Characterization

Rheological Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composite for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): A Short Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About