Capacitación no escolarizada en psicoterapia: problemas y perspectivas.

Abstract

Introduction: non-school training in psychotherapy is defined as the teaching of this intervention outside of university clinical settings and university education regulations. Although this form of study is widely accepted by psychiatrists and other mental health professionals, it may not guarantee adequate training and certification. This review describes the characteristics of non-school training in psychotherapy in Peru and addresses possible problems with training and certification. Method: an analysis of the non-schooled psychotherapy training is carried out and compared with the training model in psychotherapy of the psychiatric residency. Results: non-school training in psychotherapy is a valid study modality. However, their academic and professional scope should be better valued since these programs may not have the resources to replace university training, and they do not have the legal value to license the professional practice of psychotherapy according to current regulations of college education and professional licensing. Conclusion: it is necessary to strengthen psychotherapy training in psychiatry residency and the opening of postgraduate university programs (specialization, master or doctorate programs) so that psychotherapy training and certification follow the official training and professional licensing channels.

Hacia un Desempeño Profesional Éticamente Guiado: un Análisis en Contexto

“…Tradicionalmente, la formación postgraduada en Psicoterapia ha sido deficiente y ha estado muy desvinculada de la práctica asistencial. La FSE debería ser el espacio formativo donde naturalmente resolver esta cuestión desde la colaboración con la Universidad (Valle, 2022). Sin embargo, son pocos los Especialistas en Psicología Clínica que se desempeñan en el ámbito universitario, donde los vestigios del desarrollo liberal que ha caracterizado a nuestra profesión, aún con una incursión insuficiente en el sector público, se mantienen en gran parte de la institución, al igual que el escaso compromiso de algunos académicos del ámbito clínico con las condiciones socioeconómicas de las poblaciones y con la contribución al bienestar humano desde la perspectiva del desarrollo de su conciencia social.…”