2015
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2014.2303093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity Achieving Distributed Scheduling With Finite Buffers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We complete the proof. APPENDIX E: PROOF OF LEMMA 3 By Lemma 2, for any given R s , R r , N r , the recurrent class C is fixed and does not change with the threshold Q th ∈ Q, and the ergodic system throughput in (17) only depends on the steady-state probability vector π(Q th ) and the average departure rate vector r(Q th ) of C. Note that, by (15) and (16), π(Q th ) and r(Q th ) only depend on the link selection control for the recurrent states in C. Since q * th and q * th,next are two adjacent recurrent states, by (12), any threshold Q * th ∈ {Q|q * th ≤ Q < q * th,next , Q ∈ Q} leads to the same link selection control for the recurrent states, and hence achieves the same ergodic throughput. Under the stationary unichain policies in (5) and (12), the induced markov chain {Q t } is an ergodic unichain.…”
Section: Appendix B: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We complete the proof. APPENDIX E: PROOF OF LEMMA 3 By Lemma 2, for any given R s , R r , N r , the recurrent class C is fixed and does not change with the threshold Q th ∈ Q, and the ergodic system throughput in (17) only depends on the steady-state probability vector π(Q th ) and the average departure rate vector r(Q th ) of C. Note that, by (15) and (16), π(Q th ) and r(Q th ) only depend on the link selection control for the recurrent states in C. Since q * th and q * th,next are two adjacent recurrent states, by (12), any threshold Q * th ∈ {Q|q * th ≤ Q < q * th,next , Q ∈ Q} leads to the same link selection control for the recurrent states, and hence achieves the same ergodic throughput. Under the stationary unichain policies in (5) and (12), the induced markov chain {Q t } is an ergodic unichain.…”
Section: Appendix B: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The system of linear equations in (15) can be transformed to the following system of linear equations:…”
Section: Algorithm For Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jensen et al [15] proposed a time/utility function to describe the relationship between the running time and the utility of a task, and their aim is to maximize the total utility by finishing all tasks as quickly as possible. References [16][17][18] studied how to get the maximal utility with limited energy. In addition, in order to satisfy the utility acquirement and the energy budget, Wu et al [19] proposed a unimodal arbitrary arrival with energy bounds algorithm (EBUA), and the EBUA solved the problem of task scheduling based on unimodal arbitrary arrival model.…”
Section: Energy Saving Scheduling Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backpressure using LIFO service has been shown to offer better delay performance [10]. The framework has been extended to handle finite buffer sizes [8]. Other researchers have focused on how to make backpressure scheduling more distributed so that it can be implemented more easily [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%