2001
DOI: 10.3152/147154601781766899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity building for trade impact assessment: lessons from the development of environmental impact assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be undermined by overly close cooperation with trading partners on SIAs (European Commission 2002c). One way to avoid these problems would be for every country taking part in the negotiations or likely to be affected by their outcomes to undertake its own impact assessment to inform its negotiating position (George, Nafti and Curran 2001). Since most mitigating measures will require national policy measures, national SIAs could have practical advantages for implementation.…”
Section: Selection Of Stakeholders and Related Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be undermined by overly close cooperation with trading partners on SIAs (European Commission 2002c). One way to avoid these problems would be for every country taking part in the negotiations or likely to be affected by their outcomes to undertake its own impact assessment to inform its negotiating position (George, Nafti and Curran 2001). Since most mitigating measures will require national policy measures, national SIAs could have practical advantages for implementation.…”
Section: Selection Of Stakeholders and Related Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will not only assist in the design of more positive governmental development policies, but will help the country to understand and address existing and future 'strategic-level' decisions affecting the environment, including trade agreements (George et al, 2001), international conventions, and multilateral environmental agreements.…”
Section: Contribution Of Development Aid: Future Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although themes 2 to 7 might be regarded as capacity-building issues that would be common to the introduction of any new decision-making tool (see, for example, George et al, 2001;Cherp and Golubeva, 2004), the delivery of sustainable outcomes was a theme included because of evidence that SA did not always achieve this (Benson and Jordan, 2004;Land Use Consultants and The Royal Town Planning Institute, 2008). One explanation for this could be that the tool is simply not working well enough, and that capacity building will resolve this.…”
Section: Sustainability Appraisal In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%