2017
DOI: 10.14488/bjopm.2017.v14.n3.a13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity coordination in hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order contexts using an enhanced multi-stage model

Abstract: One of the most attracting production systems that has recently been vastly explored by practitioners and academicians is hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order. Having a hierarchical production planning structure considered, this paper develops a multi-stage model to cope with the operational decisions, including order acceptance/rejection, product lot sizing, overtime capacity planning, outsourcing, and due date setting. Moreover, the proposed framework also comprises providing alternative products for the comin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned previously, MTS systems are considered conventionally as completely dissimilar and unharmonious with MTO production systems. This issue have been addressed in the literature (Rabbani et al, 2017), where some products are manufactured based on MTO patterns and some other ones based on MTS environment.…”
Section: Motivation and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned previously, MTS systems are considered conventionally as completely dissimilar and unharmonious with MTO production systems. This issue have been addressed in the literature (Rabbani et al, 2017), where some products are manufactured based on MTO patterns and some other ones based on MTS environment.…”
Section: Motivation and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, profitable MTO orders as well as hybrid ones are accepted whereas profitless orders are rejected to avoid capacity stocking ups. Rabbani et al (2017) addressed a multi stage model dealing with the operational decisions. Their proposed framework improves the company's service level to the customer.…”
Section: /16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, regarding JIT/Kanban-based M&M-MP and systems, materials are not normally planned in advance; instead, their necessities are considered just-intime, according to their use or need, typically considering a smaller amount and/or variety of materials, and even unitary lot sizes, associated to a more stable or even certain demand. Moreover, under this production paradigm, mainly the production to order or make-to-order philosophy is carried out (Rabbani et al, 2017), to satisfy customers' orders, instead of production to stock or make-to-stock (Rabbani et al, 2017), unless bigger lot sizes or mass production is considered. Moreover, this kind of manufacturing scenario is frequently associated to the pull production philosophy (Salgado and Varela, 2010), and to product-oriented manufacturing environments, such as traditional flow shops, as, for instance, manufacturing cells based on the JIT, namely in the case of single unit lot sizes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%