Capacity Drops at Merges: Analytical Expressions for Multilane Freeways

Abstract

This paper deals with the derivation of analytical formulae to estimate the effective capacity at freeway merges in a multilane context. It extends two previous papers that are based on the same modeling framework but that are restricted to a single lane on the freeway (or to the analysis of the right lane only). The analytical expression for the one-lane capacity is recursively applied for all lanes. Lane-changing maneuvers (mandatory for the on-ramp vehicles and discretionary for others) are partitioned into two non-overlapping local merging areas. Discretionary lane-changes are transformed into a lane-changing flow using an appropriate analytical formula. This defines a system of equations whose unknowns are the capacity on all lanes and the inserting flow coming from the on-ramp. A sensitivity analysis shows that vehicle acceleration and the truck ratio are the most influential parameters for the total capacity. The analytical formulae are proven to match with numerical results from a traffic simulator that fully describes vehicle dynamics. Finally, they provide very good estimates when compared to experimental data for an active merge on the M6 freeway in UK.

Capacity Modeling of Weaving Areas on Urban Expressways with Exclusive Bus Lanes Based on Gap Acceptance Theory

“…Chen and Ahn ( 29 ) analytically estimated the capacity drop in an aggregate manner with the lane change models incorporated. Leclercq et al ( 30 ) proposed an analytical approach to simulate and quantify capacity drop numerically considering various geometric configurations of extended bottlenecks.…”

Analytical model assessing the effect of increased traffic flow intensities on the road administration, maintenance and lifetime

“…Thanks to this minimum speed, it is possible to determine the coefficient C 4 expressing the influence of the speed of heavy freight vehicles. Depending on the current speed in a given section of the route, the coefficient C 4 is equal to 1.00 for the speed higher than 50 km/h and equal to 2.00 for the speed lower than 50 km/h or when stopping vehicles [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. As already mentioned for parameter I 1 in [1,12], the entire diversion route is divided (segmented) into m homogeneous sections with a similar character of traffic.…”

Evaluating the effects of automated vehicle technology on the capacity of freeway weaving sections

“…Therefore, the proposed model is advantageous over the previous models (e.g. Leclercq et al, 2011Leclercq et al, , 2016b in that it enables the possibility to optimize the lane change distribution of automated vehicles to maximize the capacity of the weaving section.…”