2016
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201600101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity Fade Analysis of Sulfur Cathodes in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract: Rechargeable lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are receiving ever‐increasing attention due to their high theoretical energy density and inexpensive raw sulfur materials. However, their rapid capacity fade has been one of the key barriers for their further improvement. It is well accepted that the major degradation mechanisms of S‐cathodes include low electrical conductivity of S and sulfides, precipitation of nonconductive Li2S2 and Li2S, and poly‐shuttle effects. To determine these degradation factors, a compre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
170
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10] In the current model, the shuttle and any associated degradation are considered to take place only during charge. While self discharge mechanisms do take place during rest, and have been associated with the polysulfide shuttle, 22,23 the relation between the shuttle during cycling and the self discharge during rest is not established.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10] In the current model, the shuttle and any associated degradation are considered to take place only during charge. While self discharge mechanisms do take place during rest, and have been associated with the polysulfide shuttle, 22,23 the relation between the shuttle during cycling and the self discharge during rest is not established.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the accumulation of a non-conductive film of insoluble Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S, was shown to be correlated to the largest capacity fade, from amongst three possible causes. 10 Discharging below 1.8 V was shown to greatly accelerate degradation in coin cells with catholyte and shuttle suppressant, effect interpreted to be the result of producing poorly reversible Li 2 S from Li 2 S 2 . 11 Most of these studies, however, are performed on coin cells with excess electrolyte and low electrode loading, which were shown to have markedly different capacity fade rate and mechanism 12,13 compared to a commercially viable cell.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to monitored galvanostatic discharge-charge behaviors of prepared cathodes at 0.2 C (Figure 2a), the deposited Se Adv. [17] Lower polarization (lower voltage difference) represents a more kinetically efficient reaction process with a smaller barrier. 2020, 10,1903477 electrode at −1.2 V also showed a high specific capacity and low voltage difference between charge and discharge plateau.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cycle life is further limited by other degradation mechanisms inside the cell e.g., deposition of poorly soluble/insoluble products (Li 2 S 2 , Li 2 S) at the cathode, mechanical decomposition of the cathode carbon skeleton and polysulfide reaction with the electrolyte [31]. Nevertheless, these limitations seem to be less of an issue compared to the problems arising from metallic lithium anode.…”
Section: Limitations Of Lithium-sulfurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of today's research into Li-S batteries concerns the development and understanding of materials, construction and the fundamental scientific understanding of cell behavior [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%