Resource Allocation and MIMO for 4G and Beyond 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8057-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity, Fairness, and QoS Trade-Offs in Wireless Networks with Applications to LTE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…our framework will be reduced to HOL-delay fairness proposed in [65], similar to mean-delay fairness in [13]. The same observation in [13] for trade-o↵ between delay fairness and throughput (or equivalently resource efficiency) can be seen for HOLdelay fairness, by controlling the parameter ⌫ d HOL (1  ⌫ d HOL ) [66]. Reference [65] used the HOL-delay fairness and GPF mechanism sequentially (or with static separation) for RT and NRT flows packet scheduling and RB allocation.…”
Section: Delay Fairness Through Wgpfmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…our framework will be reduced to HOL-delay fairness proposed in [65], similar to mean-delay fairness in [13]. The same observation in [13] for trade-o↵ between delay fairness and throughput (or equivalently resource efficiency) can be seen for HOLdelay fairness, by controlling the parameter ⌫ d HOL (1  ⌫ d HOL ) [66]. Reference [65] used the HOL-delay fairness and GPF mechanism sequentially (or with static separation) for RT and NRT flows packet scheduling and RB allocation.…”
Section: Delay Fairness Through Wgpfmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Parameter ↵ in GPF can be used in a closed loop control system to achieve a target level of fairness [66].…”
Section: Sequential Edf and Gpfmentioning
confidence: 99%