2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03571-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity limit for faster-than-Nyquist non-orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing signaling

Abstract: Faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signal achieves higher spectral efficiency and capacity compared to Nyquist signal due to its smaller pulse interval or narrower subcarrier spacing. Shannon limit typically defines the upper-limit capacity of Nyquist signal. To the best of our knowledge, the mathematical expression for the capacity limit of FTN non-orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (NOFDM) signal is first demonstrated in this paper. The mathematical expression shows that FTN NOFDM signal has the potential to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32-QAM−128-QAM), requiring more complex DSP and sophisticated narrower linewidth LOs (<100 kHz) compared to common distributed feedback lasers (>1 MHz), our technique may relax requirements on very-high-order QAM signaling. Our technique is also transparent to higher spectral-efficient modulation formats (Fast-OFDM) [44] and non-orthogonal signal modulation techniques [45]. It should be noted that while the required SBS gain of benchmark fiberbased SBS-self-coherent systems is limited by the modulation format order, being less attractive for higher-order QAM signals compared to homodyne schemes, here, the large SBS gain (52 dB) provided by a chalcogenide chip [23] could potentially support up to 64-QAM [1] and above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32-QAM−128-QAM), requiring more complex DSP and sophisticated narrower linewidth LOs (<100 kHz) compared to common distributed feedback lasers (>1 MHz), our technique may relax requirements on very-high-order QAM signaling. Our technique is also transparent to higher spectral-efficient modulation formats (Fast-OFDM) [44] and non-orthogonal signal modulation techniques [45]. It should be noted that while the required SBS gain of benchmark fiberbased SBS-self-coherent systems is limited by the modulation format order, being less attractive for higher-order QAM signals compared to homodyne schemes, here, the large SBS gain (52 dB) provided by a chalcogenide chip [23] could potentially support up to 64-QAM [1] and above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FTN-NOFDM signal is generated when the subcarrier spacing is less than half of the symbol rate per subcarrier [20], [21]. Therefore, under the same spectral efficiency the fractional cosine transformbased (FrCT-based) FTN-NOFDM signal has less ICI than FrFT-based FTN-NOFDM signal [21]. The investigation of this paper is based on FrCT-based FTN-NOFDM signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multistream faster than the Nyquist technique initially proposed in [17] and detailed in [18] is SEFDM's time domain counterpart and has similar spectral efficiency gains with little error performance loss relative to OFDM. The recent report of [19] derives an expression which shows that nonorthogonal multicarrier signals have the potential to achieve higher capacity limits compared to orthogonal signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ameliorate the effect of such ICI, for uncoded systems, different techniques have been successfully developed, such as sphere decoder [23], fixed sphere decoder [24], pulse shaping [25], and iterative detector [26]. Furthermore, forward error correction (FEC) has been proposed and tested either on its own [27], or as a part of an interference canceller that operates iteratively over the received SEFDM symbols to cancel the interference and to improve the performance of coded systems [19], [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%