2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9342-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity models for shear strength of exterior joints in RC frames: experimental assessment and recalibration

Abstract: Several theoretical models are currently available in the scientific literature for evaluating the shear capacity of both exterior and interior beam-to-column joints in reinforced concrete (RC) frames. A reasonably wide set of those models, based on either analytical or empirical formulations, has been summarised within a companion work. The present paper firstly presents a wide database which collects results obtained in about two-hundred experimental tests carried out on RC joints. Those results are employed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of researchers have collected the test results in literature and have developed empirical and analytical relations to predict the RC joint shear capacity (Pauletta et al (2015), Muhsen andUmemura (2011), Park and, Lima et al (2012), Wong and Kuang (2014), Wang et al (2012), Jeon et al (2014) and Kassem (2016)). For example Kim and Lafave (2007) collected experimental results of semi-static cyclic tests carried out by different researchers on various types of RC beam-column connections (exterior, interior and corner joints).…”
Section: Latin American Journal Of Solids and Structures 14 (2017) 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A series of researchers have collected the test results in literature and have developed empirical and analytical relations to predict the RC joint shear capacity (Pauletta et al (2015), Muhsen andUmemura (2011), Park and, Lima et al (2012), Wong and Kuang (2014), Wang et al (2012), Jeon et al (2014) and Kassem (2016)). For example Kim and Lafave (2007) collected experimental results of semi-static cyclic tests carried out by different researchers on various types of RC beam-column connections (exterior, interior and corner joints).…”
Section: Latin American Journal Of Solids and Structures 14 (2017) 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic assumption of their model was that the load transferred from the linear elements to the joint is mainly resisted by a diagonal strut mechanism. In a state of the art article, Lima et al (2012) reviewed some of the analytical and empirical models introduced in the last two decades for predicting shear strength of RC beam-column joints. Some simplified models are also developed for simulation of the joint shear behavior in nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of RC frames (Sharma et al (2011), Favvata et al (2008 and Shayanfar et al (2016)).…”
Section: Latin American Journal Of Solids and Structures 14 (2017) 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comments reported herein represent a preliminary exam of the models considered in this study whose predictive capacity is thoroughly assessed in a companion paper (Lima et al 2012) aimed at measuring their accuracy and reliability on the basis of a wide number of experimental results collected from the scientific literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been presented in chronological order for emphasising the progressive evolution of knowledge about shear strength of RC joints and the general growing complexity of the analytical expressions proposed by various authors in the last two decades. The predictive capacity of those models is thoroughly assessed in a companion paper (Lima et al 2012) against a huge number of experimental results. However, this section proposes a synoptic comparison of the analytical expressions of the models under consideration with the aim of pointing out preliminary comments on them.…”
Section: Preliminary Comments About the Capacity Models Considered Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation