“…Here, random line balances are generated for which a signicant positive correlation between the actual work overload and criterion (12) is identied. However, in contrast to these previous studies the paper on hand tests all smoothing criteria of Agnetis (1995) 1, 25, 27 LEX DP Ajenblit und Wainwright (1998) 15 WF GA Bhattacharjee and Sahu (1987) 5 LEX HS Decker (1993) 15 LEX HI Domschke et al (1996) 1, 12, 14, 15, 27 LEX, WF B&B Kim et al (2006) 20 LEX GA Matanachai and Yano (2001) 11 , 19, 26 WF HI McMullen andFrazier (1997, 1998), Tarasewich (2003, 2006) 5 WF GA Merengo et al (1999) 27 LEX HS, HI Moodie and Young (1965) 27 LEX HI Pastor and Corominas (2000) 26 LEX TS Pinnoi and Wilhelm (1997) 7 LEX B&C Ponnambalam et al 200027 WF GA Rachamadugu and Talbot (1991) 26, 27 LEX HI Rekiek et al (2001Rekiek et al ( , 2002 5 LEX GA Sabuncuoglu et al 2000WF GA Sarker and Shanthikumar (1983) 28 LEX HI Sparling and Miltenburg (1998) 2, 20 LEX HI Suresh and Sahu (1994), Suresh et al (1996) 27 LEX GA, SA Thomopoulos (1970) 12 LEX HI Ugurdag et al (1997) 27 LEX HI Simaria (2002, 2006) 16 LEX SA, ACO each of which is to be solved by a mixed-model sequencing approach. The resulting work overload is our nal measure to compare the workload smoothing criteria with regard to their ability in reducing short-term work overloads.…”