1993
DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(93)90079-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity smoothing and sequencing for mixed-model lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, random line balances are generated for which a signicant positive correlation between the actual work overload and criterion (12) is identied. However, in contrast to these previous studies the paper on hand tests all smoothing criteria of Agnetis (1995) 1, 25, 27 LEX DP Ajenblit und Wainwright (1998) 15 WF GA Bhattacharjee and Sahu (1987) 5 LEX HS Decker (1993) 15 LEX HI Domschke et al (1996) 1, 12, 14, 15, 27 LEX, WF B&B Kim et al (2006) 20 LEX GA Matanachai and Yano (2001) 11 , 19, 26 WF HI McMullen andFrazier (1997, 1998), Tarasewich (2003, 2006) 5 WF GA Merengo et al (1999) 27 LEX HS, HI Moodie and Young (1965) 27 LEX HI Pastor and Corominas (2000) 26 LEX TS Pinnoi and Wilhelm (1997) 7 LEX B&C Ponnambalam et al 200027 WF GA Rachamadugu and Talbot (1991) 26, 27 LEX HI Rekiek et al (2001Rekiek et al ( , 2002 5 LEX GA Sabuncuoglu et al 2000WF GA Sarker and Shanthikumar (1983) 28 LEX HI Sparling and Miltenburg (1998) 2, 20 LEX HI Suresh and Sahu (1994), Suresh et al (1996) 27 LEX GA, SA Thomopoulos (1970) 12 LEX HI Ugurdag et al (1997) 27 LEX HI Simaria (2002, 2006) 16 LEX SA, ACO each of which is to be solved by a mixed-model sequencing approach. The resulting work overload is our nal measure to compare the workload smoothing criteria with regard to their ability in reducing short-term work overloads.…”
Section: Workload Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Here, random line balances are generated for which a signicant positive correlation between the actual work overload and criterion (12) is identied. However, in contrast to these previous studies the paper on hand tests all smoothing criteria of Agnetis (1995) 1, 25, 27 LEX DP Ajenblit und Wainwright (1998) 15 WF GA Bhattacharjee and Sahu (1987) 5 LEX HS Decker (1993) 15 LEX HI Domschke et al (1996) 1, 12, 14, 15, 27 LEX, WF B&B Kim et al (2006) 20 LEX GA Matanachai and Yano (2001) 11 , 19, 26 WF HI McMullen andFrazier (1997, 1998), Tarasewich (2003, 2006) 5 WF GA Merengo et al (1999) 27 LEX HS, HI Moodie and Young (1965) 27 LEX HI Pastor and Corominas (2000) 26 LEX TS Pinnoi and Wilhelm (1997) 7 LEX B&C Ponnambalam et al 200027 WF GA Rachamadugu and Talbot (1991) 26, 27 LEX HI Rekiek et al (2001Rekiek et al ( , 2002 5 LEX GA Sabuncuoglu et al 2000WF GA Sarker and Shanthikumar (1983) 28 LEX HI Sparling and Miltenburg (1998) 2, 20 LEX HI Suresh and Sahu (1994), Suresh et al (1996) 27 LEX GA, SA Thomopoulos (1970) 12 LEX HI Ugurdag et al (1997) 27 LEX HI Simaria (2002, 2006) 16 LEX SA, ACO each of which is to be solved by a mixed-model sequencing approach. The resulting work overload is our nal measure to compare the workload smoothing criteria with regard to their ability in reducing short-term work overloads.…”
Section: Workload Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Decker [18] propone la función objetivo (3), la cual minimiza la máxima diferencia absoluta entre el tiempo de estación ij p y el tiempo promedio por estación j d de cada modelo.…”
Section: Balance Horizontalunclassified