2007
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.11.8521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capecitabine Plus Erlotinib in Gemcitabine-Refractory Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: The combination of capecitabine and erlotinib is active in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. This regimen may represent an acceptable treatment option in patients who experience treatment failure with standard first-line therapy with gemcitabine or for whom gemcitabine may not be an appropriate first-line treatment option.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX), oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX), capecitabine plus erlotinib, docetaxel plus gefitinib, and FOLFOX have been tested in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer patients and showed disease control rates of 19 -53% and a median OS range of 2.9 -6.7 months (Tsavaris et al, 2005;Demols et al, 2006;Kulke et al, 2007;Xiong et al, 2008;Brell et al, 2009;Novarino et al, 2009). Recently, another oxaliplatinbased regimen, 5-FU/FA plus oxaliplatin (OFF), was shown to offer significantly improved survival compared with 5-FU/FA (FF) in a phase III trial (CONKO 003) (Pelzer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX), oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX), capecitabine plus erlotinib, docetaxel plus gefitinib, and FOLFOX have been tested in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer patients and showed disease control rates of 19 -53% and a median OS range of 2.9 -6.7 months (Tsavaris et al, 2005;Demols et al, 2006;Kulke et al, 2007;Xiong et al, 2008;Brell et al, 2009;Novarino et al, 2009). Recently, another oxaliplatinbased regimen, 5-FU/FA plus oxaliplatin (OFF), was shown to offer significantly improved survival compared with 5-FU/FA (FF) in a phase III trial (CONKO 003) (Pelzer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, few studies have assessed second-line chemotherapy, primarily because of poor prognosis (Nakachi et al, 2007) and because of the limited life expectancy of those with advanced pancreatic cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy (Kozuch et al, 2001;Tsavaris et al, 2005;Kulke et al, 2007;Xiong et al, 2008;Novarino et al, 2009). There is, therefore, a growing unmet need for a second-line chemotherapy regimen to treat patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer (Boeck and Heinemann, 2008;Kang and Saif, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain data are in favor of second-line therapy (12), whereas others do not encourage its use (13). Based on phase II data, a median survival of 4-6 months after the initiation of second-line treatment may be achieved with salvage chemotherapy in selected patients (14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite improved multimodal therapeutic regimens, its prognosis has improved only marginally, resulting in a total 5-year survival rate, which is still as low as 5% (1). More recently, agents targeted against molecular determinants of cancer cells or tumor vessels, or both, have been tested successfully in clinical trials to expand the therapeutic spectrum (2)(3)(4). However, to take full advantage of targeted therapies, it is essential to achieve a more profound knowledge of the molecular determinants of tumor development and progression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%