2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-006-0090-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary and electrostatic limitations to the contact angle in electrowetting-on-dielectric

Abstract: The shape of a conducting liquid droplet placed on a hydrophobic dielectric surface is simulated numerically by solving the Laplace-Young capillary equation. The electric force, acting on the conducting surface, distorts the droplet shape leading to a change in the apparent contact angle; its variation is compared with a theoretical Young-Lippman prediction. At sufficiently large values of voltage, applied to the droplet, the numerical algorithm fails to converge, which is interpreted as the break-up of the dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adamiak (2006) nicely summarized concerns regarding contact line and necessity of considering macroscopic contact angle far enough from it. Since treatment of the interface is so that it captures approximate location of the contact line as described in Sect.…”
Section: Implementation Of Dynamic Contact Angle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adamiak (2006) nicely summarized concerns regarding contact line and necessity of considering macroscopic contact angle far enough from it. Since treatment of the interface is so that it captures approximate location of the contact line as described in Sect.…”
Section: Implementation Of Dynamic Contact Angle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,7,26,27 It infers that at the same driving frequency, a greater droplet deformation can be excited by actuating the droplet with a larger alternating driving electric signal. For the electric driving potential used in this study (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) has become a major platform for driving droplets in microfluidic systems. Fundamentals of EWOD, including basic operations on a droplet, 2-4 dynamics of contact angle variation, 5,6 and contact angle saturation 7,8 have been extensively studied. Integrated functional chips 9-11 and in-droplet particle manipulation 12,13 based on EWOD have also been demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method is to apply an external force to drive the dynamic behavior of sessile droplets. The existing methods include applied electric fields [13,14,15,16,17], magnetic fields [18], pressure [19], air flow [20,21,22], laser [23] and so on. In these methods, the electric field driving the dynamic behavior of sessile droplets has been developed as a relatively technology exhibiting promising perspective for the droplet control [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wei et al [16] experimentally conducted the rolling behavior of the water droplet on superhydrophobic surfaces under electrical fields, and built a finite element modeling (FEM) simulation model to indicate that an electrostatic force produced by electrical fields drove a water droplet to roll. Adamiak [17] numerically simulated the deformation of an ideally conducting liquid droplet deposited on the flat dielectric surfaces by solving the capillary Laplace–Young equation. Liu [26] conducted numerical simulations and experiments on the dynamic mechanism of water droplet formation with different applied voltages and droplet distribution, and drove surface discharges on the insulator surface under an AC electric field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%