2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.09.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary bridges between spherical particles under suction control: Rupture distances and capillary forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No particular form of its rupture or vanishing has been observed. A study of the rupture of pendular bridges between spherical glass grains identifies four subsequent instabilities of different nature (Mielniczuk, El Youssoufi, et al., 2014; Mielniczuk et al., 2015 and Zhao et al., 2020).…”
Section: Data Findings and Their Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No particular form of its rupture or vanishing has been observed. A study of the rupture of pendular bridges between spherical glass grains identifies four subsequent instabilities of different nature (Mielniczuk, El Youssoufi, et al., 2014; Mielniczuk et al., 2015 and Zhao et al., 2020).…”
Section: Data Findings and Their Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is based on the integration of the liquid bridge profile with the Laplace–Young equation, while the second approach relies on the total energy of the liquid bridge. , Due to the simplicity of calculation, the energy approach gets more attention. The usual way to model the capillary force in this approach is a simplification of hydrostatic pressure across the liquid–air interface and subsequently exploits a gorge, circular, parabolic, and toroidal approximation. However, the main limitations of these methods are assumptions or approximations of the bridge profile including distance, volume, and embracing angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For continuum models for predictions to be conceivable we need a capability (upscaling) of data assimilation from the micro‐scale, as well as accounting for a deformable pore space, including a progress on evaporating menisci and contact angles for unequal grain systems (see e.g., Hu et al., 2013a, 2013b; C.‐F. Zhao et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion can be considered predictive, but to a limited degree, as we can follow (experimentally, but only in 2D case) the evolution of the meniscus diameter at the micro-scale. For continuum models for predictions to be conceivable we need a capability (upscaling) of data assimilation from the micro-scale, as well as accounting for a deformable pore space, including a progress on evaporating menisci and contact angles for unequal grain systems (see e.g., Hu et al, 2013aHu et al, , 2013bC.-F. Zhao et al, 2020). Scherer and Smith (1995) advanced a numerically analogous to Equation 1, but conceptually different, criterion of air entry interpreted as a fluid cavitation criterion.…”
Section: Conditions and Criteria For The Loss Of Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%