2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00298-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary electrophoretic determination of thiosulfate and its oxidation products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4b, and the highest analytical signal was obtained for 0.2 mmol L −1 Na 2 SO 4 from the absorbance change against electrolyte concentration corrected for analyte blank absorbance of 0.5805. The analytical signal decreased considerably for increasing Na 2 SO 4 . This effect may be explained by the additional surface charge when the Na 2 SO 4 concentration is very high, thus changing the molecular architecture of the surfactant and consequently the micelle formation process.…”
Section: Effects Of Concentration Of Nonionic Surfactant and Salting-mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4b, and the highest analytical signal was obtained for 0.2 mmol L −1 Na 2 SO 4 from the absorbance change against electrolyte concentration corrected for analyte blank absorbance of 0.5805. The analytical signal decreased considerably for increasing Na 2 SO 4 . This effect may be explained by the additional surface charge when the Na 2 SO 4 concentration is very high, thus changing the molecular architecture of the surfactant and consequently the micelle formation process.…”
Section: Effects Of Concentration Of Nonionic Surfactant and Salting-mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When compared to the analytical performance properties of the current VA-CPE method with those of other detection methods in literature such as LODs, linear working range, precision, preconcentration and sensitivity enhancement factors [4,5,13,14,30,32,33], except for IC method based on catalytic effect of thiosulfate onto photometric reaction between I 3 − and N 3 − at pH 5.0 [1] in Table 4, it shows many advantages such as simplicity, minimum solvent consumption, reasonable repeatability/reproducibility, a linear working range of 600-fold, a low detection limit with comparatively little interference with a highly good calibration sensitivity. IC as detection tool has disadvantages such as long analysis time (>15 min), expensive analysis equipment and chemicals, poor recovery due to peak tailing and/or peak overlapping especially at high concentrations, so as to lead to recalibration of instrument.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Va-cpe Methods With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9,10 Numerous reports on thiosulfate analysis have been published. [11][12][13][14][15] In these studies, thiosulfate was separated from other species by ion chromatography (IC) or capillary electrophoresis (CE), and detected mainly by measuring the conductivity or absorbance. Several sensitive and selective detection methods have utilized a postcolumn reaction of thiosulfate with Ce(IV), followed by fluorescence detection of the resulting Ce(III).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%