Abstract:I study whether the capital gains tax is an impediment to selling by some investors and if so, to what degree associated delayed selling affects stock prices. I find that selling decisions by institutions serving tax-sensitive clients are sensitive to cumulative capital gains, a pattern not observed for institutions with predominantly tax-exempt clients. Moreover, tax-related underselling impacts stock prices during large earnings surprises for stocks held primarily by tax-sensitive investors. The correspondin… Show more
“…This evidence is consistent with the capital gain lock-in effect Jin (2006). investigates whether the capital gain tax is an impediment to selling and he finds that selling decisions are negatively influenced by an amount of cumulative capital gains for institutional investors, who have a large number of tax-sensitive clients.…”
a b s t r a c tThis paper examines (i) whether value-growth characteristics have more power than past performance in predicting return reversals; and (ii) whether typical rational behaviour such as incentives to delay paying capital gain taxes can better explain long-term reversals than past performance. We find that value-growth characteristics generally provide better explanations for long-term stock returns than past performance. The evidence also shows that winners identified by capital gains dominate past performance winners in predicting reversals in the cross-sectional comparison. However, in the time-series analysis, when returns on capital gain winners are adjusted by the Fama and French (1996) risk factors, the predictive power of capital gain winners disappears. Our results show that capital gain winners are heavily featured as growth stocks. Return reversals in capital gain winners potentially reflect market price corrections for growth stocks. We conclude that investors' incentives to delay paying capital gain taxes cannot fully rationalise long-term reversals in the UK market. Our results also imply that the long-term return pattern potentially reflects a mixture of investor rational and irrational behaviour.
“…This evidence is consistent with the capital gain lock-in effect Jin (2006). investigates whether the capital gain tax is an impediment to selling and he finds that selling decisions are negatively influenced by an amount of cumulative capital gains for institutional investors, who have a large number of tax-sensitive clients.…”
a b s t r a c tThis paper examines (i) whether value-growth characteristics have more power than past performance in predicting return reversals; and (ii) whether typical rational behaviour such as incentives to delay paying capital gain taxes can better explain long-term reversals than past performance. We find that value-growth characteristics generally provide better explanations for long-term stock returns than past performance. The evidence also shows that winners identified by capital gains dominate past performance winners in predicting reversals in the cross-sectional comparison. However, in the time-series analysis, when returns on capital gain winners are adjusted by the Fama and French (1996) risk factors, the predictive power of capital gain winners disappears. Our results show that capital gain winners are heavily featured as growth stocks. Return reversals in capital gain winners potentially reflect market price corrections for growth stocks. We conclude that investors' incentives to delay paying capital gain taxes cannot fully rationalise long-term reversals in the UK market. Our results also imply that the long-term return pattern potentially reflects a mixture of investor rational and irrational behaviour.
“…Table 9 reports results of comparing the selling behavior of CEOs with those of taxable institutions. Institutions with mainly taxable clientele are identified using the approach developed in Jin (2006). In particular, using the investor profiling information obtained from the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) data maintained by the SEC, we classify as taxsensitive those institutions whose clientele consists primarily (X50%) of tax-sensitive investors such as high net worth individuals.…”
“…Second, in order to examine the differential impact based on the firm's unexpected earnings, we use quarterly data as Found evidence of stock price increases for firms added to the S&P 500, but did not see corresponding price decreases for firms remove from the index. They interpreted this phenomenon as consistent with Merton's (1987) investor awareness argument: once a stock is known, it does not become unknown Jin (2006) ''Capital Gains Tax Overhang and Price Pressure''…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…A major subset of these studies have looked at events or circumstances peculiar to a company such as being added to or removed from an S&P index. These studies find evidence, at least on the surface, of a price pressure effect (Harris and Gurel 1986;Schleifer 1986;Jain 1987;Lynch and Mendenhall 1997;Cha and Lee 2001;Chen et al 2004;Jin 2006). Several of these studies (Jain 1987;Lynch and Mendenhall 1997;Cha and Lee 2001;Chen et al 2004) while observing the price pressure, argue that it is related to an information event, e.g.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.