2001
DOI: 10.5085/0898-5510-14.2.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital Market Theory and Real Estate Valuation: A Case Study in Choosing an ‘Appropriate’ Discount Rate

Abstract: No abstract available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a rule of thumb, appraisal dispersion as indicated by standard deviation appears to be approximately 10% (Hansz and Diaz 2003), although feedback, which enables learning, and experience (Spence and Thorson 1998) can moderate this dispersion somewhat. Appraisal bias is important not only for reasons relating to disputes over property tax collection, but also in eminent domain cases (Adams, Jackson and Cook 2001) and as a potential predictor of mortgage default (LaCour-Little and Malpezzi 2003). There are also important normative issues relating to appraisal returns and risk hedging, where overly smooth appraisal-based real estate time series can unfortunately mask the true covariance structure between real estate and other asset categories (Geltner 1989, Gau and Wang 1990, Hendershott and Kane 1995, Lai and Wang 1998, Gunnelin, Hendershott, Hoesli and Soderberg 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a rule of thumb, appraisal dispersion as indicated by standard deviation appears to be approximately 10% (Hansz and Diaz 2003), although feedback, which enables learning, and experience (Spence and Thorson 1998) can moderate this dispersion somewhat. Appraisal bias is important not only for reasons relating to disputes over property tax collection, but also in eminent domain cases (Adams, Jackson and Cook 2001) and as a potential predictor of mortgage default (LaCour-Little and Malpezzi 2003). There are also important normative issues relating to appraisal returns and risk hedging, where overly smooth appraisal-based real estate time series can unfortunately mask the true covariance structure between real estate and other asset categories (Geltner 1989, Gau and Wang 1990, Hendershott and Kane 1995, Lai and Wang 1998, Gunnelin, Hendershott, Hoesli and Soderberg 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%