2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10888-015-9318-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital mobility and spatial inequalities in income and industrial location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kumar (2013) in the Indian context showed branch network having a positive impact on financial inclusion. Similarly, Zeng (2016) examined the impact of capital immobility on regional incomes and inequality. Data (from New World Wealth 2018) on world's top 15 wealthiest cities (including New York, London, Paris and Mumbai) also show that almost all of them are financial centres indicating that wealth creation and financial services may be spatially associated (due to agglomeration economies).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar (2013) in the Indian context showed branch network having a positive impact on financial inclusion. Similarly, Zeng (2016) examined the impact of capital immobility on regional incomes and inequality. Data (from New World Wealth 2018) on world's top 15 wealthiest cities (including New York, London, Paris and Mumbai) also show that almost all of them are financial centres indicating that wealth creation and financial services may be spatially associated (due to agglomeration economies).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leveling of regional differences may be hindered by the so-called Matthew effect (the concentration of wealth and poverty) that prevails in the world today [18]. An increase in capital mobility under conditions of globalization can also lead to an increase in interregional inequality [21], although mobility is constrained by high market monopolization. Researchers refer to long distances, poor infrastructure, and unfavorable institutional environment in Russia as barriers to labor and capital mobility [17].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldwin et al, 2003, ch. 12; Morita et al, 2015; Yamamoto, 2008; Zeng, 2016). However, tariffs are not considered in their models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%