1984
DOI: 10.3386/w1393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital Structure Puzzle

Abstract: This paper contrasts the "static tradeoff" and "pecking order" theories of capital structure choice by corporations. In the static tradeoff theory, optimal capital structure is reached when the tax advantage to borrowing is balanced, at the margin, by costs of financial distress. In the pecking order theory, firms prefer internal to external funds, and debt to equity if external funds are needed. Thus the debt ratio reflects the cumulative requirement for external financing. Pecking order behavior follows from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

159
2,631
6
659

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,163 publications
(3,455 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
159
2,631
6
659
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we include variables to reflect firms' growth opportunities both because firms with growth opportunities are more likely to invest in R&D and because the costs of under-investing in R&D are expected to be higher for such firms (Myers [1984], Berger [1993]). Specifically, we expect RDX to be negatively related to book-to-market ratio (BM), firm size (LOGMV), earnings-toprice ratio (EP) and firm age (AGE).…”
Section: Modeling Randd Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we include variables to reflect firms' growth opportunities both because firms with growth opportunities are more likely to invest in R&D and because the costs of under-investing in R&D are expected to be higher for such firms (Myers [1984], Berger [1993]). Specifically, we expect RDX to be negatively related to book-to-market ratio (BM), firm size (LOGMV), earnings-toprice ratio (EP) and firm age (AGE).…”
Section: Modeling Randd Intensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as information is asymmetrically distributed, financing contracts cannot completely exclude opportunistic behaviour on the part of company managers. That is the basic idea behind models that postulate a hierarchy (pecking order) of different forms of financing (Myers 1984 andMyers/ Majluf 1984). Due to risk premia and monitoring costs, external financing is usually more expensive than financing from internal sources.…”
Section: Theoretical Approaches To Explaining Family Business Financingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La littérature sur le sujet est moins abondante mais il existe néammoins quelques contributions importantes. Myers ( 1984) et Myers & Majluf ( 1984) modélisent le cas où une firme possède plus d'information que les financiers sur sa valeur. Le prix des nouvelles émissions d'actions est déterminé sur le marché en fonction de la valeur moyenne des firmes et les firmes choisissent ensuite d'émettre ou de ne pas émettre.…”
Section: Remarquesunclassified
“…Si les deux modes de financement ( La nature des coûts d'agence varie avec la structure financière. Myers (1984) suggère un ordonnancement des différents modes de financement. Il soutient qu'une émission de dette est moins coûteuse à utiliser qu'une émission d'actions, et que, par conséquent, la dette est préférée par les entrepreneurs.…”
Section: Coûts D'agenceunclassified