2000
DOI: 10.1080/146493700361042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capitalism and ethnicity: creating 'local' culture in Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the heart of this agenda, suggested Wee, was the political desire to develop ''a multicultural and historicized sense of nationhood'' (p. 140), mixed with the government's ''established ideology of economic survival'' (p. 140). Hence, as Wee (2000) put it, whilst there was a commitment to enshrine a sense of national National Education as a 'Civics' Literacy 165 identity across the curriculum through national education there was no interest in scaring away ''free floating capital'' (p. 140). Koh (2004) pointed out that national education was part of a broader reform which came under the banner ''Thinking Schools, Learning Nation'', which he suggests was the beginning of a reform which sought to realign ''educational change in response to the trajectories of (global) economic conditions, concomitantly framed by (local) sociopolitical and cultural ideological needs'' (p. 336).…”
Section: The Connection To National Education In Singaporementioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At the heart of this agenda, suggested Wee, was the political desire to develop ''a multicultural and historicized sense of nationhood'' (p. 140), mixed with the government's ''established ideology of economic survival'' (p. 140). Hence, as Wee (2000) put it, whilst there was a commitment to enshrine a sense of national National Education as a 'Civics' Literacy 165 identity across the curriculum through national education there was no interest in scaring away ''free floating capital'' (p. 140). Koh (2004) pointed out that national education was part of a broader reform which came under the banner ''Thinking Schools, Learning Nation'', which he suggests was the beginning of a reform which sought to realign ''educational change in response to the trajectories of (global) economic conditions, concomitantly framed by (local) sociopolitical and cultural ideological needs'' (p. 336).…”
Section: The Connection To National Education In Singaporementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Goh made the case that the principles of ''nationhood'', meritocracy and multiracialism needed to be rediscovered since, according to a newspaper poll, the awareness of Singapore's development and history since the end of the Second World War was particularly weak. Wee (2000) suggested that an Asian regional identity was being replaced by political edict with a nationalist agenda. At the heart of this agenda, suggested Wee, was the political desire to develop ''a multicultural and historicized sense of nationhood'' (p. 140), mixed with the government's ''established ideology of economic survival'' (p. 140).…”
Section: The Connection To National Education In Singaporementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations