“…At the heart of this agenda, suggested Wee, was the political desire to develop ''a multicultural and historicized sense of nationhood'' (p. 140), mixed with the government's ''established ideology of economic survival'' (p. 140). Hence, as Wee (2000) put it, whilst there was a commitment to enshrine a sense of national National Education as a 'Civics' Literacy 165 identity across the curriculum through national education there was no interest in scaring away ''free floating capital'' (p. 140). Koh (2004) pointed out that national education was part of a broader reform which came under the banner ''Thinking Schools, Learning Nation'', which he suggests was the beginning of a reform which sought to realign ''educational change in response to the trajectories of (global) economic conditions, concomitantly framed by (local) sociopolitical and cultural ideological needs'' (p. 336).…”