Capitalization of land development rights in rural China: A choice experiment on individuals’ preferences in peri-urban Shanghai

Wen, Lanjiao; Chatalova, Lioudmila; Butsic, Van; Hu, Fox Z.Y.; An-lu, Zhang

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104803

Cited by 17 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 74 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The integrative value compensation for rural collectives in the interlaced area is RMB 209,300/ha, RMB 165,100/ha, and RMB 218,400/ha. Compared with the current land expropriation compensation standard of RMB 430,900/ha [40,41], the compensation standards of each region discussed in this paper are 1.39 times, 1.60 times, and 1.71 times. This gap is reflected in the current compensation standard, which mainly includes farmland compensation fees and resettlement subsidies [41,42].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…Therefore, tools such as "land remediation +" and new models for the composite use of cultivated land should be actively explored to open up non-economic value-added paths for cultivated land, enhance the integrative value of cultivated land, promote land transfer, develop large-scale operations, and ultimately promote sustainable agricultural development and integrative rural revitalization in China [37][38][39]. Based on the integrative value of cultivated land resources that can be used to determine the government's land acquisition compensation standard [40], this article estimates that the average integrative value of the low mountain and hilly area is RMB 601,300/ha and the average value of the oasis agricultural area is RMB 541,200/ha. Meanwhile, the integrative value of the desert interlaced area is RMB 737,600/ha.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of Value Changes and Spatial Differences in Land Use Based on an Empirical Survey in the Manas River Basin

Yan

Wang

Liao

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Land integration is an important means of increasing the multifunctional value of arable land. The scientific measurement of the integrative value of arable land before and after land consolidation can improve farmers’ overall understanding of the value of arable land, increase their awareness of arable land protection, and encourage them to implement arable land protection policies. Additionally, it can provide a theoretical basis for the formulation of reasonable compensation standards for arable land in various areas of the Manas River Basin and effectively promote the use of the “Shawan model”. In this paper, the sample used for the survey was made up of 380 farmers from 10 villages in three different regions of Shawan City (county-level city). The participatory farmer assessment (PRA) method was used to conduct a detailed investigation of the integration of farmers’ cultivated land, while the landscape pattern index method was used to analyze the intensity of the cultivated land integration pattern. By constructing a measurement system for the integrative value of cultivated land and adding up the economic, pro-ecological, and social values before and after the integration of the cultivated land, estimated using the income reduction method, the equivalent factor method, and the shadow engineering method, we found that the cultivated land in each region of Shawan City (county-level city) was more effectively integrated, the scale of the field expanded, the shape of the patches tended to be more regular, and the field surface more flat. However, the degree of integration varied from region to region, with the degree of integration from the largest to the smallest as follows: oasis agricultural zone > oasis/desert ecological zone > hilly zone. We found that the integration of cultivated land has a significant effect on the integrated value of cultivated land, and the value of cultivated land in different regions showed different degrees of improvement after integration. The cultivated land of villages located in the oasis/desert ecotone showed a significant overall improvement after integration, followed by cultivated land in the oasis agricultural area. The value of cultivated land increased significantly, while the value of cultivated land in the hilly area showed less improvement after integration. The value of cultivated land integration in different regions is related to the intensity of the cultivated land integration, the per capita cultivated land area, the ecosystem biomass, and the crop planting area. The purpose of this paper is to effectively diagnose and promote the “Shawan Model” (land integration), formulate reasonable compensation standards for cultivated land in different regions of the Manas River Basin, and implement cultivated land protection policies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Value Changes and Spatial Differences in Land Use Based on an Empirical Survey in the Manas River Basin

Yan

Wang

Liao

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Informal settlements in peri-urban areas are not homogeneous, and the sociocultural context is considered, especially in the case of social interventions [36,64,96]. Social capital and traditions of solidarity and social networks drive peri-urbanization, which is in turn a product of the process [66,90,94]. Social capital is a resource for the creation, operation, and maintenance of infrastructures, transport and communication systems, water, food security, and access to employment and other forms of capital [59,124,134], as well as for the exchange of information and knowledge related to production [54,67,146], for facing disasters and vulnerabilities, for moving from resilience to adaptation, and for improving the management of socio-ecological systems in the peri-urban [102,138,154].…”

Section: Social Institutional Capacity To Address Changementioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability in Peri-Urban Informal Settlements: A Review

Carrilho

Trindade

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of peri-urbanization attracted attention in the final quarter of the 20th century, due to the pace it acquired worldwide and the implication that urbanization and overall settlement patterns have on social sustainability and development. Theoretical and conceptual achievements are remarkable. Multi-country collaboration has produced a growing body of research on sustainability and peri-urban settlements. There is a lack, however, of a review of the practices of peri-urban informal settlements, the predominant mode of urban expansion, mainly in developing and rapidly urbanizing regions of the world. The purpose is, then, to systematize, from recent literature, the knowledge of the context, challenges, and practices, as well as their impacts and potential courses of action, to ensure sustainability in human–natural complex of the territory beyond urban cores, suburbs, or slums. A systematic review approach was adopted, for articles published in reputable journals, with support of previous reviews, books, and reports. A pragmatist combination of content analysis and critical review identified core topics and highlighted contrasting views. An analytical framework is proposed. Four categories—drivers, challenges and practices, impact, and future trends—are proposed as an adequate approach to systematizing the literature. The review finds that the practices focus on service and resource provision, on regulations to approximate informal to formal institutions, and on an economy founded on the resource base and service provision. This review provides insights on future trends and research topics.

show abstract

“…This labor shortage leads to the abandonment of cultivated land, which has an impact on rural land transfer [113]. Second, in China, there is a dual structure between urban and rural land, in a land system composed of state-owned urban land and collectively-owned rural land [114]. The urbanization of land is going faster than the urbanization the population, and there has been a double growth with increases in both urban land and rural construction land.…”

Section: Stakeholders and Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The contradictions among the government, the village committee, and farmers are focused on cultivated land compensation disputes. The compensation benchmark for cultivated land is the direct economic loss of its agricultural value, which only accounts for 2-10% of the land value increment [114]: First, in addition to the economic compensation determined by the agricultural land output, social (e.g., employment) and ecological compensation for damaging the ecosystem must be included. Farmers and collectives should receive compensation for these, however indirect [116].…”

Section: Stakeholders and Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unraveling Risk Networks of Cultivated Land Protection: An Exploratory Stakeholder-Oriented Case Study in Xiliuhe Town, Hubei Province, China

Guo

Cai

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The protection of cultivated land plays an important role in ensuring food security, maintaining social stability, and promoting economic development. The protection of cultivated land involves a range of stakeholders (e.g., governments at different levels, farmers, and land-use organizations) and entails intertwined risk factors (e.g., to economic, environmental, social, and political factors). Therefore, it is crucial to identify and assess key stakeholders and associated risks to better align land protection policies. However, previous studies of risk are fragmented, and there has been little research targeting the complex interactions among risk factors in the protection of cultivated land. Taking Xiliuhe Town as an example, this study analyzes complex and intertwined risk factors from a network perspective in an in-depth case study in a major grain-producing area. The results show that: (1) the risk-factor network of cultivated land protection is relatively sparse, with a total of 142 nodes and 253 links; (2) local governments and land flow-out farmers are the core stakeholders, with strong power and connectivity in the network; (3) taking into account key stakeholders and associated risk factors, a framework for mitigating risks is developed, and a network simulation is performed. Using the simulation results, the effectiveness of the risk-mitigation strategies is assessed and validated. These results shed new light on cultivated land protection and sustainable agricultural development in emerging countries.

show abstract

Capitalization of land development rights in rural China: A choice experiment on individuals’ preferences in peri-urban Shanghai

Cited by 17 publications

References 74 publications

Assessment of Value Changes and Spatial Differences in Land Use Based on an Empirical Survey in the Manas River Basin

Assessment of Value Changes and Spatial Differences in Land Use Based on an Empirical Survey in the Manas River Basin

Sustainability in Peri-Urban Informal Settlements: A Review

Unraveling Risk Networks of Cultivated Land Protection: An Exploratory Stakeholder-Oriented Case Study in Xiliuhe Town, Hubei Province, China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About