2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAPPI: A Cytoskeleton-Based Localization Assay Reports Protein-Protein Interaction in Living Cells by Fluorescence Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that rerouting various proteins to distinct subcellular localizations is feasible in our system. Other 'anchor-away' techniques such as NTA, CAPPI and MILo (Dixon and Lim, 2010;Kaplan--Levy et al, 2014;Lv et al, 2017) are limited in terms of subcellular rerouting options due to their direct fusion with the anchor. By contrast, KSP easily combines with multiple anchors without the need to re-clone fusion constructs.…”
Section: Rapamycin-induced Fkbp-frb Heterodimerization Is Feasible In Plantamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that rerouting various proteins to distinct subcellular localizations is feasible in our system. Other 'anchor-away' techniques such as NTA, CAPPI and MILo (Dixon and Lim, 2010;Kaplan--Levy et al, 2014;Lv et al, 2017) are limited in terms of subcellular rerouting options due to their direct fusion with the anchor. By contrast, KSP easily combines with multiple anchors without the need to re-clone fusion constructs.…”
Section: Rapamycin-induced Fkbp-frb Heterodimerization Is Feasible In Plantamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of 'drag-away' technique has already been explored for PPIs in plant research. For instance, the Nuclear Translocation Assay (NTA), the Cytoskeleton-based localization Assay for Protein-Protein Interaction (CAPPI), and the Modification of Intracellular Localization (MILo) function via a similar approach (Dixon and Lim, 2010;Kaplan--Levy et al, 2014;Lv et al, 2017). Nevertheless, the above tools are not conditional, and their subcellular targeting options reported so far are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The readout of these colocalization assays is usually the translocation of one protein upon its association with a second distinctly localized protein (e.g., localization to a membrane, the nucleus, or granules). “Cytoskeleton-based assay for protein-protein interaction” (CAPPI), “membrane recruitment assay” (MeRA), and “knocksideways in plants” (KSP) are powerful translocation assays developed for use with plant cells (Grefen et al, 2008; Lv et al, 2017; Winkler et al, 2021). “Nuclear translocation assay” (NTA), “emerging circle of interactive proteins at specific endosomes” (ECLIPSE), and “protein interactions from imaging of complexes after translocation” (PICT) are assays, which require the addition of a compound (e.g., rapamycin) to monitor the translocation upon PPI (Dixon and Lim, 2010; Gallego et al, 2013; Lee et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful applications of this method to cytosolic proteins Atg8 and Atg8-interacting proteins, transmembrane proteins Atg9 and Ctl1, nuclear proteins Xrc4 and Lig4, components of the Atg1 complex, and components of the two PtdIns3K complexes demonstrate that the Pil1 co-tethering assay is an effective tool that can be broadly used to detect protein-protein interactions. In other organisms, imaging-based colocalization assays similar in principle but different in design have been used for the detection of binary protein-protein interactions (Blanchard et al, 2006;Gallego et al, 2013;Herce et al, 2013;Lv et al, 2017;Miller et al, 2007;Yurlova et al, 2014;Zolghadr et al, 2008). In this study, we expanded the applications of this class of assays to the detection of ternary and quaternary protein-protein interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%