2014
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CAPriCORN: Chicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network

Abstract: The Chicago Area Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Network (CAPriCORN) represents an unprecedented collaboration across diverse healthcare institutions including private, county, and state hospitals and health systems, a consortium of Federally Qualified Health Centers, and two Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. CAPriCORN builds on the strengths of our institutions to develop a cross-cutting infrastructure for sustainable and patient-centered comparative effectiveness research in Chicago. Unique aspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[69][70][71] Future studies examining the effects of practice facilitation may be enhanced by patient-specific outcomes, and electronic health records integrated across care sites, to better portray a complete understanding of patient health outcomes. 72,73 This review has several limitations by including studies with potential biases: interventional self-awareness (practice facilitation in the practice), variability in the quality and methodology of the studies, other internal or external factors influencing process and outcome measures, and reporting of studies with disease-specific quantitative process and outcome measures. The inclusion of studies from the USA and Canada prevents generalizability beyond North America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[69][70][71] Future studies examining the effects of practice facilitation may be enhanced by patient-specific outcomes, and electronic health records integrated across care sites, to better portray a complete understanding of patient health outcomes. 72,73 This review has several limitations by including studies with potential biases: interventional self-awareness (practice facilitation in the practice), variability in the quality and methodology of the studies, other internal or external factors influencing process and outcome measures, and reporting of studies with disease-specific quantitative process and outcome measures. The inclusion of studies from the USA and Canada prevents generalizability beyond North America.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permission and access management is an issue wider than technology, which encompasses IT solutions, policies like access audits and new personnel checking and regulatory compliance [16, 90] The access control used in REMS can be seen as a variant of a lists-based access control approach (ACL [91]). Compared to similar products [92–94], REMS is focused on granting resource access based on the commitment to a data access agreement, and the final approval from personnel with the data access control role. Moreover, REMS allows for the definition of workflows to obtain and finalise the access approval procedures, and it logs the actions during the execution of these workflows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially coordinated by the Chicago Community Trust (and now by Northwestern University), CAPriCORN began as a collaboration among 11 diverse public/private healthcare institutions in the Chicago area, including a county health system, five academic medical centers, a consortium of Federally Qualified Health Centers, and two Veterans' Affairs hospitals. CAPriCORN institutions provide healthcare to over one million patients mirroring the socioeconomic and racial diversity of the region …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAPriCORN institutions provide healthcare to over one million patients mirroring the socioeconomic and racial diversity of the region. 27 The central governance body for CAPriCORN is a steering committee consisting of representatives from each of the partnering institutions along with one patient and one clinician representative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%