Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on 122 neonatal bloodstream isolates of group B streptococci (GBS) to further examine the relationship between macrolide resistance and serotype V GBS (GBS-V).Over one-third (35%) of macrolide-resistant GBS belonged to a single PFGE subtype of GBS-V, which was also the most common GBS-V subtype noted in previous Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance studies. Erm methylase (ermA and ermB) was the most common resistance mechanism detected, present in 12 of 20 macrolide-resistant GBS.Group B streptococci (GBS) cause significant morbidity and mortality in neonates and can also cause serious infections in adults (20,21). Several serotypes of GBS exist (9), but only a few (serotypes Ia, Ib, Ic, II, and III) are common causes of human disease. Over the past decade, several investigators reported an increasing proportion of GBS disease to be due to serotype V (GBS-V) (1,2,8,11,21). During the same period, several investigators also reported an increase in macrolide (erythromycin) and clindamycin resistance among GBS isolates from U.S. hospitals (1,13,15,17). In addition, several groups (including ours) have recently reported an association between macrolide resistance and GBS-V (1, 10, 12). It was found that, though GBS-V accounted for only ϳ10% of neonatal GBS bloodstream isolates, 40% of erythromycin-resistant and 83% of clindamycin-resistant strains were GBS-V (1).To further investigate the association between macrolidelincosamide resistance and the emergence of GBS-V, we performed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of the SmaI chromosomal DNA digests of 122 neonatal bloodstream isolates of GBS for which antimicrobial susceptibilities and serotype distribution had previously been described (1). To determine if macrolide-resistant GBS-V represented a new subtype, we included a strain previously characterized by Elliott and colleagues (6) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and found to be the most common GBS-V PFGE pattern detected in the United States (representing 56% of isolates collected between 1986 and 1996).The GBS bloodstream isolates in this study were collected as part of the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program (1). This report focuses on all neonatal bloodstream isolates of GBS obtained between January 1997 and December 1999 from 35 medical centers throughout the Western Hemisphere.Upon receipt at the University of Iowa, GBS isolates were subcultured onto blood agar to ensure viability and purity. Confirmation of species identification was performed by conventional methods: all GBS in our study were confirmed by the Christie-Atkins-Munch-Petersen test. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution methods as described by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (14).Serotyping was performed by an agglutination test with rabbit antisera to serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V, as described previously (1). For PFGE analysis, genomic DNA w...