1993
DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.21.6.786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Captopril or conventional therapy in hypertensive type II diabetics. Three-year analysis.

Abstract: The effects of long-term treatment with captopril and conventional therapy on albuminuria and metabolic parameters were compared in 74 hypertensive type II diabetics with normal serum creatinine. Patients were treated double-blind with either captopril monotherapy or combined with hydrochlorothiazide or therapy with metoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide, or both for 36 months. The treatment was titrated to achieve goal diastolic blood pressure of £85 mm Hg. The reductions in blood pressures during treatment were sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antihypertensive medications have been withdrawn in several previous and recent trials in hypertensive diabetic patients, typically in a 1-month wash-out period or placebo run-in phase before the study to assess baseline values (43)(44)(45)(46). Similarly, IRMA-2 was preceded by a 4-week wash-out period of previous antihypertensive medication (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antihypertensive medications have been withdrawn in several previous and recent trials in hypertensive diabetic patients, typically in a 1-month wash-out period or placebo run-in phase before the study to assess baseline values (43)(44)(45)(46). Similarly, IRMA-2 was preceded by a 4-week wash-out period of previous antihypertensive medication (5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The placebo arm of the IRMA-2 and IDNT studies included commonly used antihypertensive treatment like diuretics, ␤-blockers, calcium channel blockers (except dihydropyridines), and central ␣-antagonists to achieve the target blood pressure of Ͻ135/85 mmHg (4,5). The evidence supporting a specific renoprotective effect of ACE inhibitors, i.e., a beneficial effect of ACE inhibitors on kidney function beyond the hypotensive effect in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria, is conflicting in the nine studies published to date (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). The relatively long-term U.K.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathy with short-or long-acting ␤-blockers fail to show a substantive reduction in microalbuminuria when compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. [13][14][15] However, to date, ␤-blockers have not been examined with regard to their effects on albuminuria in the presence of agents already known to affect blood pressure and albuminuria (ie, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%