2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capture method affects survival estimates and subsequent interpretation of ecological covariates for a long‐lived cervid

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We captured 50 female (>1.5-yr-old) white-tailed deer in each county by using aerial net-gunning from 24 February to 2 March 2014. We collected blood at time of capture and centrifuged it into cellular and serum fractions that were, respectively, discarded and frozen at –80 C. Vaginal implant transmitters (VITs; Advanced Telemetry Systems, Inc., Isanti, Minnesota, USA) were implanted at time of capture in a subset of 20 females to aid in neonate capture, help determine fawning habitat, and evaluate survival rates in each study area (Brackel et al 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We captured 50 female (>1.5-yr-old) white-tailed deer in each county by using aerial net-gunning from 24 February to 2 March 2014. We collected blood at time of capture and centrifuged it into cellular and serum fractions that were, respectively, discarded and frozen at –80 C. Vaginal implant transmitters (VITs; Advanced Telemetry Systems, Inc., Isanti, Minnesota, USA) were implanted at time of capture in a subset of 20 females to aid in neonate capture, help determine fawning habitat, and evaluate survival rates in each study area (Brackel et al 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%