2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing correlation with a mixed recursive logit model for activity-travel scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We close by noting that a recently increasingly popular approach for problems similar to ours is the formulation of activity chains within a recursive logit (RL) framework (Zimmermann et al 2018 ; Hidaka et al 2019 ; Västberg et al 2020 ; Gao and Schmöcker 2021 ). With such an approach path or activity choice probabilities can be obtained for large network applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We close by noting that a recently increasingly popular approach for problems similar to ours is the formulation of activity chains within a recursive logit (RL) framework (Zimmermann et al 2018 ; Hidaka et al 2019 ; Västberg et al 2020 ; Gao and Schmöcker 2021 ). With such an approach path or activity choice probabilities can be obtained for large network applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on the development of NGEV route choice models in the literature Akamatsu, 2012, 2014;Papola and Marzano, 2013;Mai, 2016), our contributions open up the applicability of NGEV-based models in the traffic assignment context. The framework can also be applied not only to vehicular networks, but also to various types of networks, such as transit networks based on frequency (e.g., Lam et al, 1999;Ma and Fukuda, 2015) or with a timetable (e.g., Nielsen and Frederiksen, 2006;Nuzzolo et al, 2001), urban pedestrian networks (e.g., Hato, 2016, 2018), and activity-based networks (e.g., Zimmermann et al, 2018). It should be noted that, although the MTA models are mathematically rigid, they generally require more computational effort than Dial's model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baqueri et al extended the model to study the limitation of the size of the study area, which is the defect of the activity-based model, and considered the activity trips outside the study area in the trip chain [11]. In addition, in the analysis of activity trip and influencing factors, Zimmerman et al use the hybrid recursive logit model to comprehensively consider the activity, time, place, trip, and other aspects [12] and improve the recursive logit model proposed by Fosgerau et al to release the limitation of IIA, making the model more effective in explanation and prediction [13]. In order to explore the complexity of individual activity travel decision-making dimensions, Fu Xuemei conducted a joint modeling analysis on the five decision-making dimensions of activity travel, and confirmed that there is an interaction between different decision-making dimensions.…”
Section: Activity-based Travel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%