2022
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.210353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing crop adaptation to abiotic stress using image-based technologies

Abstract: Farmers and breeders aim to improve crop responses to abiotic stresses and secure yield under adverse environmental conditions. To achieve this goal and select the most resilient genotypes, plant breeders and researchers rely on phenotyping to quantify crop responses to abiotic stress. Recent advances in imaging technologies allow researchers to collect physiological data non-destructively and throughout time, making it possible to dissect complex plant responses into quantifiable traits. The use of image-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 176 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, this data helped Berni et al. (2009) ; Al-Tamimi et al. (2022) in quantifying various traits of water stress responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Further, this data helped Berni et al. (2009) ; Al-Tamimi et al. (2022) in quantifying various traits of water stress responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To obtain thorough phenotypes while minimizing interference, noninvasive phenotyping is widely used, without requiring physical splitting or biochemical extraction as traditional invasive methods do. Noninvasive phenotyping also has the distinct advantage of being comparable and reproducible, with the potential to realize kinetic monitoring of the growth and development of the same organs without obvious and serious disturbance [ 7 9 ]. Noninvasive phenotyping can be achieved through optical sensing, utilizing optical waves (the light wave and type of electromagnetic radiation) to interact with the object and feedback spectral characteristics [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, imaging is more intuitive to human vision. Therefore, 2D imaging is now the most widely used form of plant stress phenotyping [22][23][24]. Two-dimensional imaging comprises visible, multispectral, hyperspectral, IR, thermal-IR, and ChlF imaging [22,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%