2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: A simulation study

Abstract: A key challenge in functional neuroimaging is the meaningful combination of results across subjects. Even in a sample of healthy participants, brain morphology and functional organization exhibit considerable variability, such that no two individuals have the same neural activation at the same location in response to the same stimulus. This inter-subject variability limits inferences at the group-level as average activation patterns may fail to represent the patterns seen in individuals. A promising approach t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
230
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
230
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a first analysis step requiring minimal prior assumptions on data characteristics, we applied a multivariate group independent component analysis (ICA) (16)(17)(18)(19) to the data of 26 healthy subjects (13 pairs) in step A. This data-driven approach identified 16 maximally independent sources (components) that, together, account for the observed fMRI data of all subjects (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a first analysis step requiring minimal prior assumptions on data characteristics, we applied a multivariate group independent component analysis (ICA) (16)(17)(18)(19) to the data of 26 healthy subjects (13 pairs) in step A. This data-driven approach identified 16 maximally independent sources (components) that, together, account for the observed fMRI data of all subjects (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, subject-specific time courses of each component are available via back reconstruction, for which the partitioned data reduction matrices are projected to aggregate component matrix [components in rows; used back reconstruction algorithm GICA I (16,17,18)]. This is called PCA-based back reconstruction and was shown to be highly accurate compared with other approaches to back reconstruction (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the scan, subjects were exposed to visual stimuli on an LCD-Monitor eyeglass (Resonance Technology, Inc. Northridge, USA). Conditions alternated between a rest (R) and a VF condition, each lasting 30 s. The task started with the R-condition 7 (gray screen with a fixation cross). In the VF condition, a letter was displayed and subjects were instructed to silently produce as many verbs starting with the shown letter.…”
Section: Fmri Task and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, the region of interest (ROI) is chosen using anatomic landmarks. However, from functional brain studies it is well known that besides substantial individuality of cortical morphology [2,3], there is considerable interindividual variability in terms of the exact location of cortical activation for specific brain functions [4,5,6,7]. Hence, if metabolic disturbances are hypothesized to be restricted to or most expressed in limited areas representing specific brain function, the ROIs for MRS investigations have to be defined functionally in each subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data processing method simplifies the computational expense and benefits the improvement of the generation performance. Some typical feature extraction methods, such as wavelet packet transform (WPT) [7][8][9][10], empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [11], time-domain statistical features (TDSF) [12,13] and independent component analysis (ICA) [14][15][16][17] have been proved to be equivalent to a large-scale matrix factorization problem (i.e., there may be still some irrelevant or redundant noise in the extracted features) [18]. In order to resolve this problem, a feature selection method could be employed to wipe off irrelevant and redundant information so that the dimension of extracted feature is reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%