2015
DOI: 10.1561/0300000055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing Knowledge: Private Gains and Public Gains from University Research Partnerships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, we focused on three psychological distance dimensions, passion, trust behavior and approved GM crops at the individual level. Distributed cognition may have weakened or strengthened the connections found 104 at the collective and organizational levels. Future research may consider collective or group, cultural and ethnic elements affecting individual cognition.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, we focused on three psychological distance dimensions, passion, trust behavior and approved GM crops at the individual level. Distributed cognition may have weakened or strengthened the connections found 104 at the collective and organizational levels. Future research may consider collective or group, cultural and ethnic elements affecting individual cognition.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the micro-level, scholars initially focused on personality traits (Rauch and Frese, 2007), entrepreneurial traits (Mueller and Thomas, 2001), motivations (Scheinberg and MacMillan, 1988), beliefs and values (McGrath et al , 1992; McGrath and MacMillan, 1992), but most of the more recent research shifted its focus to entrepreneurial cognition (Alvarez and Busenitz, 2001; Mitchell et al , 2002; Shepherd and Krueger, 2002). Randolph-Seng et al (2015) noted that entrepreneurship research has been “individuals-focused, while ignoring interactions among those individuals, ignoring the context, and missing a meta-theory that takes into account these contextualized interactions.” While this paper does not build a meta-theory, our theoretical framework contributes to clarifying the context within which the process of entrepreneurship happens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.00-4.00 4.00-5.00 5.00-6.00 with the entrepreneurial cognition approach of the upper echelons theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984;Randolph-Seng et al, 2015). According to this perspective, entrepreneurial cognition (thought structure and information processing system) influences an entrepreneur's strategic decision.…”
Section: Complex Links Between Coping Combination and Innovation Ambimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper echelons theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984;Hambrick, 2007) holds that an entrepreneur's cognition in strategic decision-making inevitably influences firm-level outcomes (Bromiley and Rau, 2016). More specifically, studies on the underlying logic of entrepreneurial cognition (Mitchell et al, 2002;Randolph-Seng et al, 2015) revealed that coping reshaped an entrepreneur's cognitive structure and elicited different types of information processing systems (Burns and D'Zurilla, 1999;Ucbasaran et al, 2009), that influenced firmlevel outcomes by exerting an impact on an entrepreneur's strategic decision-making. Therefore, the importance of studying the effect of coping at the firm level is highlighted on the basis of the entrepreneurial cognition approach, although the initial purpose of coping is to overcome stress at an individual level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%