2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capturing near-Earth asteroids around Earth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the introduction of the Palermo scale to rank of a subset of NEOs offered an objective criterion based on the potential impact hazard (Chesley et al 2002). Finally, following the interest in capturing small NEOs (Sánchez and McInnes 2011a, b;Sánchez et al 2012b;Brophy et al 2012;Hasnain et al 2012), a new, objective, quantifiable and ordered criterion has been proposed, that classifies a subset of NEOs into Easily Retrievable Objects (EROs): the latter are the asteroids that can be gravitationally captured in bound periodic orbits around the collinear libration points L 1 and L 2 of the Sun-Earth restricted three-body model under a certain Δv threshold, arbitrarily selected at 500 m/s (Sánchez et al 2012a;García-Yárnoz et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the introduction of the Palermo scale to rank of a subset of NEOs offered an objective criterion based on the potential impact hazard (Chesley et al 2002). Finally, following the interest in capturing small NEOs (Sánchez and McInnes 2011a, b;Sánchez et al 2012b;Brophy et al 2012;Hasnain et al 2012), a new, objective, quantifiable and ordered criterion has been proposed, that classifies a subset of NEOs into Easily Retrievable Objects (EROs): the latter are the asteroids that can be gravitationally captured in bound periodic orbits around the collinear libration points L 1 and L 2 of the Sun-Earth restricted three-body model under a certain Δv threshold, arbitrarily selected at 500 m/s (Sánchez et al 2012a;García-Yárnoz et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The in-situ utilisation of resources in space has long been suggested as the means of lowering the cost of space missions, by, for example, providing bulk mass for radiation shielding or distilling rocket propellant for interplanetary transfers (Lewis, 1996). Although the concept of asteroid mining dates back to the very first rocketry pioneers (Tsiolkovsky, 1903), evidences of a renewed interest can be found in the growing body of literature on the topic (Baoyin et al, 2010, Sanchez and McInnes, 2011a, Hasnain et al, 2012, as well as in high profile private enterprise announcements such as by Planetary Resources Inc 1 Brophy et al, 2012 . A recent asteroid retrieval mission study ( ) proposed the capture of a 2-4 m diameter asteroid around the Moon with current technologies, which could serve as test-bed for the development of technologies for in-situ resource utilisation (ISRU).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of capturing small NEAs with relatively low energy has been investigated in detail in recent work (Sanchez and McInnes 2011;Hasnain et al 2012;Sanchez et al 2012). In these studies, periodic orbits around the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 libration points are regarded as potential parking orbits for captured asteroids, since the Sun-Earth L1 and L2 points are natural gateways to other systems, e.g., the Earth-Moon (EM) system (Koon et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a focus for new research, near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) have attracted significant attention for scientific mission applications (Zimmer 2013;Hasnain et al 2012;Brophy et al 2012b). Moreover, there is a growing commercial interest in NEA resources (Tronchetti 2014;Andrews et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%