2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13420-016-0257-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capuchin monkeys can make and use stone tools

Abstract: Summary Scientists hoping to elucidate the origin of human stone tool manufacture and use have looked to extant primate species for possible clues. Although some skepticism has been raised, there is clear evidence that today’s capuchin monkeys can make and use stone tools.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the relations between handedness, tool use, and language itself as documented in this article may have evolutionary roots even earlier than the separation of the hominins from the line leading to modern great apes. Another recent study reveals that even capuchins make and use stone tools ( Wasserman and Thompson, 2017 ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the relations between handedness, tool use, and language itself as documented in this article may have evolutionary roots even earlier than the separation of the hominins from the line leading to modern great apes. Another recent study reveals that even capuchins make and use stone tools ( Wasserman and Thompson, 2017 ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though tool use has been observed in both the Catarrhini and Platyrrhini, only a limited number of primate species have been observed using tools, and even fewer have been documented to use tools habitually (Haslam et al, 2013;Ottoni & Izar, 2008;Wasserman & Thompson, 2017). In a widely used definition of tool use, Beck (1980, p. 10) insists that a tool must be an item "separate from that of the body of the user," must be derived from the environment, and "must be manipulated" to produce an "intentional outcome."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool use by nonhuman primates is of particular interest for primatologists, anthropologists, paleoanthropologists, psychologists, and neuroscientists because of its potential to inform understanding of both nonhuman primate ecology and cognition as well as tool use in hominin evolution (Bandini et al, 2020; Barrett et al, 2018; Haslam, 2013; Johnson‐Frey, 2004; Osiurak & Reynaud, 2020). Though tool use has been observed in both the Catarrhini and Platyrrhini, only a limited number of primate species have been observed using tools, and even fewer have been documented to use tools habitually (Haslam et al, 2013; Ottoni & Izar, 2008; Wasserman & Thompson, 2017). In a widely used definition of tool use, Beck (1980, p. 10) insists that a tool must be an item “separate from that of the body of the user,” must be derived from the environment, and “must be manipulated” to produce an “intentional outcome.” Here we use St. Amant and Horton's (2008, p. 1203) definition that tool use is “the exertion of control over a freely manipulable external object (the tool) with the goal of (1) altering the physical properties of another object, substance, surface or medium (the target, which may be the tool user or another organism) via a dynamic mechanical interaction, or (2) mediating the flow of information between the tool user and the environment or other organisms in the environment.” This definition is used preferentially to that of Beck (1980) because it includes all of Beck's requirements while also including mediation of information and target alteration as potential objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%