2005
DOI: 10.1680/cpdh.34389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Car park designers' handbook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The space optimization is mainly due to the compact structure of the automated parking lot and the absence of circulation lanes. Depending on the conventional parking lot layout, the benefits of high-density parking lots could even be considerably higher as 22 m 2 per parking space is considered good static efficiency of a car park with 100 parking spaces at 90 • [36]. Note also that adding a second buffer area would still allow to hold almost twice the number of vehicles in a given parking area but would improve the flexibility of the system operation and decrease the number of conflicting trajectories in the buffer area.…”
Section: Results (Static Parameters)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space optimization is mainly due to the compact structure of the automated parking lot and the absence of circulation lanes. Depending on the conventional parking lot layout, the benefits of high-density parking lots could even be considerably higher as 22 m 2 per parking space is considered good static efficiency of a car park with 100 parking spaces at 90 • [36]. Note also that adding a second buffer area would still allow to hold almost twice the number of vehicles in a given parking area but would improve the flexibility of the system operation and decrease the number of conflicting trajectories in the buffer area.…”
Section: Results (Static Parameters)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a large area divided into compartmental areas for fire prevention, in which the designer has sought the best and most efficient general arrangement of parking spaces and lanes according to the size of each section. The driveways and surface public roads have been designed to ensure maximum efficiency, and the directions of the pedestrian paths have been designed to ensure access to the shopping areas in the shortest possible time [16].…”
Section: Acoustical Signal Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill [10] suggests that a 'good' parking efficiency ranges from 20 m 2 /space for 300 parking spaces at 90°up to 35 m 2 /space for 30 spaces at 45°while Butcher et al [11] cited parking areas per vehicle in the range of 18.5-26.8 m 2 . A survey of open top floors of 41 New Zealand multi-storey car parking buildings using Google Earth found typical static efficiencies are 28.9 ± 5.1 m 2 /space.…”
Section: Static Efficiency Of Car Parksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the set of recommendations, the static efficiency of a parking area could be as low as 16 m 2 /space for a LOS D category while it could be as high as 40 m 2 /space for a LOS A category. Chrest et al note that efficiencies as low as 16 m 2 /space are car park designs for 100% 'small' cars.Hill [10] suggests that a 'good' parking efficiency ranges from 20 m 2 /space for 300 parking spaces at 90°up to 35 m 2 /space for 30 spaces at 45°while Butcher et al [11] cited parking areas per vehicle in the range of 18.5-26.8 m 2 . A survey of open top floors of 41 New Zealand multi-storey car parking buildings using Google Earth found typical static efficiencies are 28.9 ± 5.1 m 2 /space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%