Caracterização físico-química de frutos de novos híbridos e linhagens de mamoeiro

Reis, R. C.; Viana, E. de S.; Jesus, J. L. de; Dantas, J. L. L.; Lucena, Rangel Sales

doi:10.1590/s0100-204x2015000300004

Cited by 19 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean value of SS contents was 13.66 °Brix, TA was 0.098% citric acid, and the SS/TA ratio was 145.99 (Table 2). These values agree with those obtained by Pinto et al (2013a) and Reis et al (2015), except for fruit weight, which was lower in the present study, but compatible with that of traditional Solo cultivars (Oliveira & Vitória, 2011;Costa et al, 2013). For the genotypes of the Formosa group, the mean number of fruits was 16.12, each weighing 1,298.82 g, and plant production per plant was of 20.37 kg.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 93%

“…These values were higher than those reported by Oliveira et al (2010) and Reis et al (2015). However, when considering characteristics of great phenotypic variation, the CV values were acceptable for papaya (Pinto et al, 2013a(Pinto et al, , 2013b and allowed identifying differences between treatments.…”

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 56%

“…In the winter harvest, PT varied greatly among genotypes, as reported by Luz et al (2015). In summer, 'L 54-08', 'UC 14', and 'Golden' had the lowest means, differing from the other genotypes, which is in alignment with Reis et al (2015), who found low variability for this characteristic among the evaluated genotypes. PT is an important quality attribute because it indicates higher yield (Luz et al, 2015); moreover, fruits with a lower PT, have a larger internal cavity, being more susceptible to losses during transport and storage (Oliveira et al, 2010).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 50%

“…The fruits of the cultivars of the Solo group are small (500-700 g), have reddish pulp, and are preferred for export, whereas those of the Formosa group are medium-sized (1,000-1,500 g) and have reddish-orange pulp (Oliveira et al, 2012). The hybrids of the Formosa group have been gaining ground in the domestic and foreign markets, with growth in exports to Europe, Canada, and the United States (Reis et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, factors such as cultivar, water regime, temperature, incidence of pests and diseases, light exposure, and fruit maturity at harvest markedly affect fruit quality (Moretti et al, 2010). When comparing different cultivars, Reis et al (2015) observed variations in the morphological and physicochemical characteristics of the fruits, which allowed identifying the best papaya genotypes of the Solo and Formosa groups. However, these authors did not consider the variation of these characteristics within each heterotic group and throughout the production cycle.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Productivity and quality of Formosa and Solo papaya over two harvest seasons

Barros

Kuhlcamp

Arantes

et al. 2017

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The objective of this work was to evaluate the productivity and quality of papaya fruits (Carica papaya) of the Solo (12 genotypes) and Formosa (9 genotypes) heterotic groups over two harvest seasons. The experiment was conducted under field conditions in the municipality of Pinheiros, in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, in a randomized complete block design. Ten morpho-agronomic and physicochemical variables of the fruits were measured in winter (210-300 days after planting) and summer (450-540 days after planting). The data were subjected to the combined analysis of variance, to the breakdown of the genotype x environment interactions, and to the grouping of means by the Scott-Knott test. Although harvest season affected the evaluated characteristics, it did not alter the classification of the genotype. In the Solo group, the H 36-45 and UC 15 hybrids stand out due to their greater productivity, fruit weight, and soluble solids contents. In the Formosa group, the Rubi Incaper 511 cultivar shows greater productivity, higher number of commercial fruits, and lower number of deformed fruits over both evaluated harvest seasons.Index terms: Carica papaya, agronomic performance, environmental effect, genotype evaluation. Produtividade e qualidade de frutos de mamão Formosa e Solo em duas épocas de colheitaResumo -O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a produtividade e a qualidade de frutos de mamoeiro (Carica papaya) dos grupos heteróticos Solo (12 genótipos) e Formosa (9 genótipos), em duas épocas de colheita. O experimento foi conduzido em condições de campo em Pinheiros, ES, em delineamento de blocos ao acaso. Dez variáveis morfoagronômicas e físico-químicas dos frutos foram avaliadas no inverno (210 a 300 dias após o plantio) e no verão (450 a 540 dias após o plantio). Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância conjunta, à decomposição da interação genótipo x ambiente e ao agrupamento das médias pelo teste de Scott-Knott. Embora a colheita em diferentes épocas tenha influenciado as características avaliadas, não alterou a classificação dos genótipos. No grupo Solo, destacam-se os híbridos H 36-45 e UC 15, por suas maiores produção e massa do fruto e por seu alto teor de sólidos solúveis. No grupo Formosa, a cultivar Rubi Incaper 511 apresenta maior produção, maior número de frutos comerciais e menor número de frutos deformados nas duas épocas de colheita avaliadas.Termos para indexação: Carica papaya, desempenho agronômico, efeito ambiental, avaliação de genótipos.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 56%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 50%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Productivity and quality of Formosa and Solo papaya over two harvest seasons

Barros

Kuhlcamp

Arantes

et al. 2017

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Association between traits related to fruit quality in papaya (Carica papaya L.) hybrids and their implications for selection

Pereira Miranda,

Ramos,

Santa‐Catarina

et al. 2023

Agronomy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The knowledge of the associations between the variables and the cause‐effect discrimination allows the breeders to make efficient of new cultivars development with traits that meet of producers and consumers demands. Therefore, the present work aimed to study the associations and among the quality variables of papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruits and the effects in selection process. Eight variables related to fruit quality were evaluated in 62 topcross hybrids. The phenotypic and genotypic correlations and path analyses, were performed to verify the associations between the variables and the effects on pulp volume. Canonical correlation analysis between primary and secondary quality variables was also carried out. Fruit firmness (FF) and soluble solids content showed a positive and significant genotypic correlation, providing evidence for selecting fruits with high averages for both variables. Fruit weight and pulp thickness (PT) were the variables that most contributed to the reduction and increased pulp volume percentage (%PV), respectively. The canonical correlation analysis showed an increase in PT associated with an increase in the fruit length and %PV variables. The physical‐chemical variables showed a low association with others, which will make the selection process more laborious to obtain satisfactory gains between the groups of variables.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

show abstract